|
# o3 v4 ^) ]0 r' ^; J- n, s& c5 A3 O
2 A9 X- [* u' F; |( U# G% } | DSH 319
% K) i0 s& W# C( S+ j | Compliance for requirements for Electric Shock Protection, u# F& E. B: `) x4 E5 n/ L, ~
| 4.4.4.1
( F1 F6 C* `2 \$ H- _ | 61010-1(ed.1);am1;am2$ O! }- @% ?* D8 v: p1 l
| ' @8 y# {) c. ^' h/ p1 J. K! X
2 v2 W! I# ^, k; d' Q7 n
Standard:% \4 o5 j8 h0 H* V
IEC 61010-
- Z& t; _( i' [* P1990+A1:1992+A2:1995
% [# a7 `; ?% d2 i& q+ MSub clause: r, T& q) G0 J/ ~
4.4.4.1
) ^% F5 z7 T* \% \2 fSheet n. 3190 ^7 `! s, D( {% ?# H4 N
Page 1(1)4 i8 {$ Q# u6 p6 v, u5 F8 @5 n: [- ^
Subject:
+ U% c5 q- _4 w7 U7 Y1 o* m$ B: q" ^Compliance for requirements for
$ _$ ~+ g) s( U: {; p( Pelectric shock protection8 U- V+ |% c' o2 y4 u8 V. i; C
Key words:: Y8 a+ I3 m5 u- z
- Shock
1 V8 Z- C* i- `( T# ?; ]0 `- Fault condition
. k3 e( z* y4 E" YDecision taken by
3 p k( h9 l" O( E, sETF3 and confirmed
) o( ?2 ]* r$ F$ oby CTL at its 38th6 f$ X t! u8 w$ Z' Q) X
meeting, in Toronto& P/ a% T$ V$ R
Question:) r6 Y; k2 t/ o
If a fuse operates when checking equipment in Single Fault Condition as required by
# L9 M& q; c/ H4 ^Clause 6.3.2, should the fuse be replaced before the measurement of voltage, current and6 Y6 T4 k3 W' ]3 S5 y/ x
capacitance are made?
( F% T! A7 _/ ^! L& p9 `Decision:; U) t. L2 `* ~6 D+ l- A" J% d
Where the fuse link is operator replaceable it should be replaced up to 3 times to enable the
6 C! v/ i/ z6 y. c5 {3 omeasurements of 6.3.2 to be performed.
* r. m4 J! v" I" B" n' @" RExplanation:
' a2 O7 Q( T/ r2 F1 ~1 f) E% E9 z9 w+ YWhere operators are instructed to replace a fuse link this should be done for a maximum of 3/ O1 ^$ s; x; y c" x0 u
times and no hazard as defined in 6.3.2 should arise.
( }$ @1 R0 Y$ O) I6 j' j: y0 iWhere the link is not designated as replaceable by the Operator then this should not be done.( t7 C, ~% T1 E; b0 w
7 M/ u5 C' J1 M& c- n. B" a7 n, K9 c' j2 t3 I G' A: f
* a- g% G+ X# I1 [0 x& p- X
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册安规
x
|