|
| DSH 252A9 r0 G, _, u4 |% m2 ]9 b
W4 z; c: B3 {0 X
| Allowance of crimp connection for type M attachment
& Z% d) y5 ]: @2 y | 2.2.10 and 26.1/ \1 L7 `+ U. M# I
| 60335-1(ed.2)* E2 f H+ |2 \5 n5 K6 j) a
|
! F, w+ ?2 K! @2 h K0 ZStandard: IEC 335-1, 2nd edition
) K5 \) h/ ]7 p! dSub clauses: 2.2.10 and 26.1, V+ K2 n5 J$ l9 w! ^5 e
Sheet n. 252 A
9 c7 Z2 j5 E7 U6 ^+ o% j, q+ |Subject: Allowance of crimp connection for type M attachment
4 i* m8 q, J7 A* v9 j! bKey words:
. E( P' s7 A$ N/ g- crimp connection
M, e e0 }& i- type M attachment
8 Y( |, N: v5 q1 lDecision 13 of 34th meeting/1997
7 Z% z6 |; z+ X- m) |( L4 U4 cQuestion:9 e* [/ J: F% f# N1 n
Subclause 2.2.10 states that crimp connections are allowed for type M attachment,; p7 i* I) v, l
and
5 y& {% Q( N% G0 J# ~" `subclause 26.1 specifies that “For appliance with type Y attachment or type Z
4 M! F9 V) ~6 m9 q- p/ O c9 n5 Wattachment, soldered, welded, crimped and similar connection may be used for the
8 y) B" W% n3 [6 A: A8 W. oconnection of external conductors”
0 ~( s* O2 S$ v L7 w& H1 qIs there any inconsistency between the two a.m. subclauses regarding the allowance
; h4 Q/ x+ J2 lof crimp connections in type M attachment?
7 {9 b& W+ I& LAre crimp connections acceptable for type M attachment?
! e' I3 G% l8 [. [Decision:" K5 q1 X$ ^; r! d8 Y
- There is no inconsistency between subclauses 2.2.10 and 26.1, as subclause 26.1
! \' L2 @' t1 s. C! v4 grefers to types Y and Z attachments and not to type M attachment.
' x3 U, Z: y( _# D+ P. B% H. o- s- Crimp terminations forming part of a type M attachment are acceptable (see
4 Z; y! T1 W6 Hsketch below).
- H& Y' W0 m: Q4 f! A2 A
6 }% z- |; k3 B, d) V5 M |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册安规
x
|