|
| DSH 252A
. ?& |$ N( J" R3 j; B7 x9 s9 _! o4 [5 q8 g
| Allowance of crimp connection for type M attachment
$ H9 a: `6 l# r0 h; U+ K, H# Y, i m( @ | 2.2.10 and 26.12 F/ W6 B4 p8 g% V+ `" n
| 60335-1(ed.2)
- M* z8 W- m( f$ b7 j- k | 7 e/ P! R. @8 R2 S
Standard: IEC 335-1, 2nd edition
6 j1 u- j. n' d( e0 j# ISub clauses: 2.2.10 and 26.1* d: D. @/ D' `2 U) S
Sheet n. 252 A- e+ [) L5 w! @5 w5 }
Subject: Allowance of crimp connection for type M attachment
6 Q+ n. ~: y' cKey words:7 J6 J: o* U# [) {
- crimp connection1 z0 y$ q4 ~+ ]7 k4 ?0 M
- type M attachment
) W; @4 ]& G2 uDecision 13 of 34th meeting/1997: a1 y* u" p3 B/ O1 Q
Question:
/ @ Y2 D: ?$ t/ QSubclause 2.2.10 states that crimp connections are allowed for type M attachment,
5 {; }0 @' Y, W9 x" Qand& N# x, d8 ^9 _" O
subclause 26.1 specifies that “For appliance with type Y attachment or type Z
1 K, i8 J. q9 q* {$ z0 h0 jattachment, soldered, welded, crimped and similar connection may be used for the
& E, p- y! Q6 D/ u$ wconnection of external conductors”/ \% y7 n" p& l6 N
Is there any inconsistency between the two a.m. subclauses regarding the allowance
' G) ~% V1 d1 Rof crimp connections in type M attachment?) {; r0 P% J7 o. C) h
Are crimp connections acceptable for type M attachment?" I: e9 o. X2 b: w! V- V" y) X
Decision:
1 i3 [7 Z( N/ E0 [- w; C. X1 e- There is no inconsistency between subclauses 2.2.10 and 26.1, as subclause 26.1; C: B t L8 B6 g$ a' A! v4 r5 }
refers to types Y and Z attachments and not to type M attachment.
& [4 s& x' Z- C, S: A' Q- Crimp terminations forming part of a type M attachment are acceptable (see
. {# I& h2 k T3 Msketch below).
6 {* s/ q# q2 e3 ~: ~2 F
" s) ?% G. Z* ?( `& U |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册安规
x
|