|
| DSH 568
2 M* P& Y4 u+ Z5 B6 X: e9 e U4 m
| Varistors (VDR’s) across the mains, O' k0 i9 q/ V: J9 g- j8 v
| 19.11. ~1 M4 r; N7 v+ T! P5 k- ^* r
| 60335-1(ed.4)( p! f7 F$ i6 U: M
| , |+ s) R; [/ `( J- w4 G9 b
Question:. q2 l( J+ T1 Y+ W9 \/ _
Reports from different Testing Laboratories and clients expose essential differences in interpretation and testing practice between laboratories and/or Certification Bodies.& P% P4 h% I- D0 H
Actually, the practice of one Certification Body is now being a market factor.- r) z! q$ g$ W+ ]% y2 V
Based on above concerns we ask for clarification:6 k, b2 S: X& q
1: Shall Cl. 19.11 be strictly followed or can solutions given under 2. be accepted.
$ l% P, b3 ?. ~- x0 ^2: Can any of the decisions (made by OSM/EE) be accepted?
/ }0 f/ S e) k! T: X5 {5 W; \- A: VDR’s across the mains are accepted if the VDR is separately certified according to IEC 61051-1 or according to CECC 42200.& P" L. \; Q% t; Z
- B: VDR across the mains with a protective device to guard against short-circuit is acceptable." L) L/ L+ c1 ^" H! g4 C
- C: If A and B are acceptable, should, because of the fact that VDR’s may burn or burst during life-time due to an increasing temperature stress caused by increase of leakage current with a number of switching cycles in the VDR, a thermal interrupting device on the VDR connected in series with the VDR be required.
l3 U6 ~9 k9 v" bDecision:5 o% O1 p `, y+ S/ q+ z
1. VDR’s are not short-circuited if they are used within their manufacturer’s declared specification, when tested according to Sub-clause 19.11.2 of IEC60335-1(1991).+ B& f) v7 x2 ]. Q) Y: @
2. VDR’s are short-circuited regardless of compliance with IEC61051-1, when tested according to Subclause 19.11.2 of IEC60335-1(2001).
: _. I) _6 p- {6 P7 V6 R
& k! I( [5 @" N; f
4 }" e6 t0 H$ p5 F, Q |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册安规
x
|