|
| DSH 568
5 C$ ?8 P5 e" Q- v. f4 x/ ?2 c7 j' w" Q$ _8 ^( |- U4 ^: ~. L
| Varistors (VDR’s) across the mains
. R# c0 q2 I* g. F$ Y J( R | 19.11/ v3 |! W$ \# {4 }2 A. |9 d% d
| 60335-1(ed.4)
6 e+ g# j* i: n; h2 R |
2 ?4 x' Y7 U/ m3 v( D1 F) ?% @Question:
0 `! u" |. Q% [Reports from different Testing Laboratories and clients expose essential differences in interpretation and testing practice between laboratories and/or Certification Bodies.+ d9 _3 O* y0 V% y/ ~" E
Actually, the practice of one Certification Body is now being a market factor.
3 n9 X) g$ i) t0 UBased on above concerns we ask for clarification:
8 G H% C' C2 | z' c# p2 Y1: Shall Cl. 19.11 be strictly followed or can solutions given under 2. be accepted.# z" H1 Y% L7 |* A$ L0 t
2: Can any of the decisions (made by OSM/EE) be accepted?; Y: X4 Q4 _. o6 U0 U9 s, C
- A: VDR’s across the mains are accepted if the VDR is separately certified according to IEC 61051-1 or according to CECC 42200.: H4 \ X' U7 f7 d
- B: VDR across the mains with a protective device to guard against short-circuit is acceptable.. \3 {# h& J- v" [: L
- C: If A and B are acceptable, should, because of the fact that VDR’s may burn or burst during life-time due to an increasing temperature stress caused by increase of leakage current with a number of switching cycles in the VDR, a thermal interrupting device on the VDR connected in series with the VDR be required.
& b# Q k8 Z X* @Decision:$ f$ ?6 K, l% r
1. VDR’s are not short-circuited if they are used within their manufacturer’s declared specification, when tested according to Sub-clause 19.11.2 of IEC60335-1(1991).# I2 I# o: O: I; l. h
2. VDR’s are short-circuited regardless of compliance with IEC61051-1, when tested according to Subclause 19.11.2 of IEC60335-1(2001)., B, ^( }& ?$ D3 x3 ~
& b7 ]0 B) z! O( w4 ^# v' P
1 Z1 a+ _7 H+ x5 A# j ` |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|