|
| DSH 252A
7 j% g- a' f e& t
. c/ I1 R1 b- s; a | Allowance of crimp connection for type M attachment) o; }6 {& m0 f7 K, Z4 E
| 2.2.10 and 26.1
Q+ M0 F- s6 C8 C2 a7 J! { | 60335-1(ed.2)7 B1 O5 E( J4 T! z2 X% ]$ u9 ]6 N
| 9 p* G! M D# q+ i. h i4 [8 M
Standard: IEC 335-1, 2nd edition
0 Z& _- m) T# A" ZSub clauses: 2.2.10 and 26.1( ]1 ?0 Y. t! o9 A* T- S: i& l
Sheet n. 252 A
. f1 m/ a( U. t2 v- w% RSubject: Allowance of crimp connection for type M attachment
. p! Q7 p8 S' ?Key words:! R3 {; n# f! d8 u1 {$ F/ s3 ]
- crimp connection" r1 [% a# r) @6 g
- type M attachment+ u. ^4 ~; `" N3 L, p1 ~
Decision 13 of 34th meeting/19972 p* R( C) O, Y6 r i4 _7 H
Question: ~ M. ~% _, g' w; D
Subclause 2.2.10 states that crimp connections are allowed for type M attachment,
/ I3 v# L1 y; I; K" tand2 @# S8 I4 q& V+ n! b
subclause 26.1 specifies that “For appliance with type Y attachment or type Z
: l; b+ s1 G, N# P3 Y4 P. ~attachment, soldered, welded, crimped and similar connection may be used for the
3 N$ X( i7 v( M; C& \1 Jconnection of external conductors”5 }# ?% x5 F. W8 `6 z4 I, L# N
Is there any inconsistency between the two a.m. subclauses regarding the allowance
0 V h* X& p, g- ?5 x) nof crimp connections in type M attachment?
; J U4 ]0 c% f0 `, XAre crimp connections acceptable for type M attachment?, P% W% e/ f' G- p
Decision:8 @$ x8 \$ X7 p+ l" g
- There is no inconsistency between subclauses 2.2.10 and 26.1, as subclause 26.1
- }- Q. h; b+ ?/ _refers to types Y and Z attachments and not to type M attachment.
- V; o. b( I8 a3 ?. K: V% \- Crimp terminations forming part of a type M attachment are acceptable (see
, p( B& f7 }) q' Msketch below).. S; x9 k: ?' _) U
: N$ N$ U% m( g- g/ Y
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册安规
x
|