|
| DSH 568/ H* ]. F9 e2 B4 v7 K7 n! h
3 [5 q3 w' W2 c/ v | Varistors (VDR’s) across the mains* n0 M/ Y5 J4 `6 U' P9 P' D
| 19.11
# w3 G }+ s8 J& m; `( w5 G7 R | 60335-1(ed.4)
[( D0 M4 v. |6 p6 u& n7 l1 U | - {* X: K- M7 g5 M2 z
Question:
) a4 X" s/ g+ G- K/ v9 l2 IReports from different Testing Laboratories and clients expose essential differences in interpretation and testing practice between laboratories and/or Certification Bodies.) ~5 f0 r8 E S* Z
Actually, the practice of one Certification Body is now being a market factor.
3 a/ m) y: R" N( ]8 |, OBased on above concerns we ask for clarification: i+ }0 H0 e4 r, s
1: Shall Cl. 19.11 be strictly followed or can solutions given under 2. be accepted.
8 K3 G3 }. F7 M+ {8 b& `2: Can any of the decisions (made by OSM/EE) be accepted?
" V; M0 @6 X5 q- A: VDR’s across the mains are accepted if the VDR is separately certified according to IEC 61051-1 or according to CECC 42200.+ J3 T2 @2 n1 [& {% s. q& j
- B: VDR across the mains with a protective device to guard against short-circuit is acceptable.
' B; ~( Y' T, V! ^. p- C: If A and B are acceptable, should, because of the fact that VDR’s may burn or burst during life-time due to an increasing temperature stress caused by increase of leakage current with a number of switching cycles in the VDR, a thermal interrupting device on the VDR connected in series with the VDR be required.
. k4 _4 z8 T- J( A2 G7 ^& IDecision:
3 W4 _' H+ v0 B d' K1. VDR’s are not short-circuited if they are used within their manufacturer’s declared specification, when tested according to Sub-clause 19.11.2 of IEC60335-1(1991).
2 D. O3 D, I1 j O2 ~, c x( I w2. VDR’s are short-circuited regardless of compliance with IEC61051-1, when tested according to Subclause 19.11.2 of IEC60335-1(2001).1 W1 c; B5 C9 a" l/ Z
# S$ D4 {3 v( u& O/ g; a1 A
0 N( W8 Z% ?) V. I/ t" u% Z |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册安规
x
|