安规网

 找回密码
 注册安规
安规论坛 | 仪器设备 | 求职招聘 | 国家标准 公告 | 教程 | 家电 | 灯具 | 环保 | ITAV 签到 充值 在线 打卡 设备 好友| 帖子| 空间| 日志| 相册
IP淋雨机 | 证书查询 | 规范下载 | 资质查询 招聘 | 考试 | 线缆 | 玩具 | 标准 | 综 合 红包 邮箱 打卡 工资 禁言 分享| 记录| 道具| 勋章| 任务
水平垂直燃烧机 | 针焰 | 灼热丝 | 漏电起痕
IP防水防尘设备|拉力机|恒温恒湿|标准试验指
灯头量规|插头量规|静风烤箱|电池设备|球压
万年历 | 距元旦节还有
自2007年5月10日,安规网已运行
IP淋雨设备| 恒温恒湿箱| 拉力机| 医疗检测设备沙特Saber 埃及COI 中东GCC|CoC直接发证机构水平垂直燃烧机|灼热丝|针焰试验机|漏电起痕试验机
灯头量规|试验指|插头插座量规|灯具检测设备耐划痕试验机|可程式恒温恒湿试验箱 | 耦合器设备广东安规-原厂生产-满足标准-审核无忧
楼主: fytang
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[综合话题] 关于TOASTER的结构疑问,

[复制链接]
11#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-9-2 15:48 | 只看该作者
广东安规检测
有限公司提供:
这是最新的TUV回复,1 C6 ~5 p2 h) G4 `. f5 z+ V
Reinforced insulation was required when switch was at OFF position. ( ^6 j: M  J# Z3 c8 A# e6 S$ q8 v
Although the test finger is not applicable for visibly glowing heating element according to clause 8.1.3, but when the switch was placed at OFF position, the end user is possible to touch bare heating element due to heating element not glowing and heating, so the bare heating element should be considered as accessible parts and must satisfy with requirements of reinforced insulation of clause 29. The test finger is applicable in clause 29.
0 H! m0 t1 b* l# S" f7 l4 d" Y我的理由是,
. F$ x, |. m$ PBut I think whether this sample can pass Cl. 29 or not depends on how you define the creepage requirement.  If we judge it as functional insulation then it will pass Cl. 29   .   and 8.1.3 give us a reference regarding how to judge those heating element whether accessible or not .  hence according to 8.1.3 , we should judge this part is inaccessible not matter it’s in the on-mode or off mode .
12#
发表于 2010-9-2 16:43 | 只看该作者
引用第10楼fytang于2010-09-02 15:48发表的  :' ]/ S5 o/ h2 C
这是最新的TUV回复,
* T1 p  a1 B: G' P/ Q" {0 V5 o Reinforced insulation was required when switch was at OFF position. ) V0 v5 {8 d% l! e- j: d
Although the test finger is not applicable for visibly glowing heating element according to clause 8.1.3, but when the switch was placed at OFF position, the end user is possible to touch bare heating element due to heating element not glowing and heating, so the bare heating element should be considered as accessible parts and must satisfy with requirements of reinforced insulation of clause 29. The test finger is applicable in clause 29.
! Y! x2 J' z& j$ U我的理由是,4 e/ ~. Y1 W  }( P
But I think whether this sample can pass Cl. 29 or not depends on how you define the creepage requirement.  If we judge it as functional insulation then it will pass Cl. 29   .   and 8.1.3 give us a reference regarding how to judge those heating element whether accessible or not .  hence according to 8.1.3 , we should judge this part is inaccessible not matter it’s in the on-mode or off mode .
我完全支持TUV 的观点, 我的理解也跟他一样,这也是我前面说他有道理的原因.
13#
发表于 2010-9-2 16:44 | 只看该作者
引用第10楼fytang于2010-09-02 15:48发表的  :
, j" C9 j- D+ C1 M, J. Z+ g% Z这是最新的TUV回复,9 J2 z& x6 r. b$ |+ [
Reinforced insulation was required when switch was at OFF position.
- f$ W% z, K2 ]7 \Although the test finger is not applicable for visibly glowing heating element according to clause 8.1.3, but when the switch was placed at OFF position, the end user is possible to touch bare heating element due to heating element not glowing and heating, so the bare heating element should be considered as accessible parts and must satisfy with requirements of reinforced insulation of clause 29. The test finger is applicable in clause 29.
: H# [) d4 Q3 {我的理由是,* j( ?0 A: s  {% e6 [
But I think whether this sample can pass Cl. 29 or not depends on how you define the creepage requirement.  If we judge it as functional insulation then it will pass Cl. 29   .   and 8.1.3 give us a reference regarding how to judge those heating element whether accessible or not .  hence according to 8.1.3 , we should judge this part is inaccessible not matter it’s in the on-mode or off mode .

1 A) O! c  ^9 o1。The heating element is not live parts at off mode, even the user may touch the heating wire, it is no danagerous
) @- a8 m% }7 S7 \- G/ P: \2 A
6 s9 V1 X8 g, f4 {2. . second, from the std, it never require to use finger to replace test probe 41 at any condition.
, u0 A# u4 r. ?! d( @9 I! z0 Q9 E
) L6 e! |5 j3 |! U4 s( G6 v  E3. another possible solution to you: Find a report which is issued by them, I believe they will hit their face themselves as far as I know, al switch in Toaster like yours.
14#
发表于 2010-9-2 17:15 | 只看该作者
Agree with the upstair. Whether the switch is "ON"or"OFF", the heating element need not test by
9 m# s; a0 ~% P6 `# Xprobe 41.
15#
发表于 2010-9-2 17:26 | 只看该作者
我也碰到过类似同一间机构的不同分支(如GZ的SZ)的判定标准不一致,最后都是按后面这一家要求整改的。因为标准其实很笼统,不同的工程师可以有不同的解读。但对于这些安全性问题,到了客人那里往往都是认同认证机构的意见的。很无奈!
16#
发表于 2010-9-2 21:45 | 只看该作者
这是最新的TUV回复,
0 c5 l  A6 e- s( A3 _5 uReinforced insulation was required when switch was at OFF position. " s% w8 q  `4 t- }# [. u
Although the test finger is not applicable for visibly glowing heating element according to clause 8.1.3, but when the switch was placed at OFF position, the end user is possible to touch bare heating element due to heating element not glowing and heating, so the bare heating element should be considered as accessible parts and must satisfy with requirements of reinforced insulation of clause 29. The test finger is applicable in clause 29.
7 o8 l8 U2 X3 f8 F% ~2 |- b3 J/ x
) V8 |# K5 b4 X& _; v# Y$ h首先,按照功能绝缘的定义335-1中3.3.5 insulation between conductive parts of different potential which is necessary only for the proper functioning of the appliance,判断,两触点之间并没有电势差,所以这不是功能绝缘,按加强绝缘判是没有疑问的。
' G+ a. i* n% u  g3 t2 H其次,发热丝如果不是visibly glowing heating element 而且可以碰到的话,那么需要用测试指来考核它的防触电,这样的话,防触电是肯定过不了的,所以只有两个结果:
- q. O3 i+ Y5 ^; K5 Q- h. [7 v1: 防触电过不了
# I" e) Q+ |' u" d- \4 t- o6 w& t5 V2: 工程师误判(原因:完全可以把触点看作是导通的,但是正常和非正常测试都已经pass了,也就证明了该产品符合温升及防触电等要求,而且这个只是电子控制的开关,应该还有机械开关控制着主电路吧)
17#
发表于 2010-9-3 10:29 | 只看该作者
其实换个角度想下, 如果不是这种开关, 换成普通的有认证的开关呢?是不是也不可以用?这似乎没有道理吧, 但是有认证的开关也就满足61058的标准, 并不满足加强绝缘的说法啊
* g2 D) f) I5 ^当然了 这个是GS, 发证机构是可以有解释的, 毕竟GS的判定不单单是标准 还有那个GPSG也是要考虑的
18#
发表于 2010-9-3 10:45 | 只看该作者
Pls check definition of "visibly glowing heating element ", we cna not define it as "visibly glowing heating element"when it is operated, but define it is not when it is off.
: ~4 @' {4 }" Y/ E+ [4 e
# i4 Q# Z* X1 H/ }: ivisibly glowing heating element
4 \+ |6 G2 {0 {- j$ Y+ iheating element that is partly or completely visible from the outside of the appliance and has+ T% H4 W2 e! D' X9 q. g4 M: M- x( L
a temperature of at least 650 °C when the appliance has been operated under normal4 [% I* ?( G. ?$ o
operation at rated power input until steady conditions have been established.
19#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-9-3 15:42 | 只看该作者
我的回复,
  f$ K( O/ O# [( BHowever , I checked clause 29 ,in clause 29  no explanation is given regarding how to define accessible part .  there is no sentence to say use test finger to replace test probe 41 to define the accessible part . test finger in clause 29 only used for reduce the clearance on accessible part. 4 F) x6 b4 _, V& W9 z6 W
Can we think this through on this way .  we premise reinforced insulation on here have to be followed .    if I only use some standard switch certified by EN61058 instead of current mechanical switch plus PCB To operate this machine , that means it violate standard .   I don’t think so .  . r! I. ]3 x0 i( g4 o" S& b
TUV 的回复
2 s) ]4 U2 J2 J& q6 p  I think our bifurcation is whether the heating element is live part or not./ ?. }' s' j& u+ c  }
According to Cl.3.6.3:: [) w$ S$ P5 G7 K8 B
accessible part: ~" v5 z3 @% X& t: v2 L$ O
part or surface that can be touched by means of test probe B of IEC 61032, and if the part or" ~, `. y6 Z. e7 j6 ~* W  ?5 o) [0 B
surface is metal, any conductive part connected to it  `' B4 T: J: ~+ W8 |
accessible part should be defined by “test probe B”. Therefore, the heating element is accessible part
20#
发表于 2010-9-6 10:17 | 只看该作者
我始终觉得TUV在不停的偷换概念。. j1 `# {' H' h" ]# }
1。 测试手指:probe B or Probe 41:
9 e: b6 K: E# `2 I) B- Y5 v# t1 v; [$ O  \3 c
according to -2-9:
# i& S/ P9 y! P( H! o8 A8.1.1 Addition:+ q& ^1 B" C' R5 u9 U
For toasters having a crumb tray, the test finger is not applied through the crumb-tray7 \5 k& b1 G) T( A: G7 g
opening to live parts that are disconnected by the operation of a double pole switch.) o7 [- s; y* ]! s( O' i+ W
However, it shall not be possible to touch these parts with test probe 41 of IEC 61032.6 V1 g" w% E6 G2 X2 h% C
" q" `7 J' t# u6 p8 z
so we shall use test probe 41 to see if it can touch live parts(i.e. heating element)6 v+ ?2 A  H/ q

4 B( @/ \  X9 d2. live parts/accessible parts:
! {; T  O( `% h" G0 a: P1 q; k
% o; a8 V# S1 K* zHeating element is live part  parts, and it can not be considered as "accessible parts" as we don't use probe B in 8.1.3. i.e. the definition of "accessible part" is no applicable for Toaster.
- \$ `. q9 O& H7 i6 H/ J; |5 o1 t9 b
' D( e/ A2 \9 z2 o" X) Y) o3. visibly glowing heating element:
6 e  _9 r" C/ ]; O' y4 A& U) X' E% _1 Q1 _' n
as I said before, heating element is "visibly glowing heating element"  whether the toaster is on or off. and it never require to use test probe B to verify.
3 s. B) K& b: m6 ?3 F9 n
4 h* d8 C+ H& `
+ A: `4 l9 {6 V3 E' }! UI think the key point is: TUV use test probe B, however it is not allowed for Toaster in this construction.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册安规

本版积分规则

关闭

安规网为您推荐上一条 /2 下一条

QQ|关于安规|小黑屋|安规QQ群|Archiver|手机版|安规网 ( 粤ICP13023453-10 )

GMT+8, 2024-11-23 02:07 , Processed in 0.067538 second(s), 16 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.|广东安规赞助

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表