|
本帖最后由 terry20120318 于 2012-11-27 16:56 编辑
8 Y# }/ C% J ?
$ y* P1 ~7 o8 g+ Y+ X+ y) j( C( R: E) }% C4 p. r0 d, B, l
6 _4 ^- A/ O! w( B% B
Question:
$ t$ D3 x) e: A; M z; kHow a product should be marked and/or classified when it consists of a set of:
7 P( N+ e6 v+ @ V: s1. An independent control gear (Class I or Class II) with SELV output- D) y8 @+ p8 N' f; b. O) t/ L
and* d2 `/ H' D+ P3 i0 ?( k% w
2. A luminaire (one or more) which is detachable from the control gear (by hand)?
3 W7 }' h9 [% |& H0 o; `Decision:
2 Q/ g8 n! j( l1 h- The independent control gear shall be classified as Class I or Class II;, r6 c( k; L& R: A+ Q6 [& }0 J
- The luminaire shall be marked as Class III;
8 y! j/ f1 C5 C; V% i3 I$ D2 C- The whole product may be marked as Class I or Class II on the package. Another way is to mark/ o9 k+ g& l' F; u; [" ?" s7 X( Q, A: \
the package with the rated voltages of the control gear and the luminaire. Class III marking on the
$ ?8 i0 V8 j5 a0 d0 P8 `package may be misleading, and if applied alone, the marking will be incorrect;: P5 }6 d6 ^( u+ \& a/ |. p$ c
- The control gear shall be tested according to Class I or Class II and the luminaire according to
8 r3 o: v c- ~1 p7 N: MClass III.
4 `, I3 D' K& ?' |4 A. y0 IExplanatory Notes:
' o& b `% v3 ^5 T
3 U o: b; ^4 b) o8 n B0 K! \% X4 O
各位前辈,请教下此份决议0 l6 m, B% q! g( J
从决议看,认证时可以出一份三类灯具证书+一份二类电源证书,然后放在一个包装箱内出货,是这个意思吧,没有讲一定要按整体做一个二类灯具的证书,只是包装箱上做标示即可。
+ Y+ ^+ W/ m1 u% B- Z7 p9 Y/ m如果是的话,分开出证,有利于公司 以后更换电源供应商。
- J& Z; |7 y' ~* O% F, ]第二,一份三类灯具证书+一份二类电源证书,放在一个包装箱内出货,欧洲海关会不会认为有问题,
, g6 ?7 O& S2 H% o: B) B
7 y' t5 ~ Q' R+ w1 W5 u多谢回复
1 F+ J, _6 I* F/ u! x L t( Y& i2 V+ r' J
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|