|
| DSH 588' K- D2 G; N8 U2 k* n- F0 V( h1 w
% G: p; d" s3 B4 h4 K# j+ z' N
| Verification of main contact position, position of the handle) \" _2 z- e+ Y) o. O1 t, z
| 8.2.5.3.2 of IEC60947-1 and 8.3.3.9 of IEC60947-2
) F; p% E, S) ^; w$ j9 R# t+ g' m | 60947-1(ed.1);am1 & 60947-1(ed.2) & 60947-1(ed.2);am1;am2 & 60947-1(ed.3) & 60947-1(ed.3);am1;am2 & 60947-1(ed.3);am2 & 60947-1(ed.4) & 60947-1(ed.5) & 60947-1(ed.5);am1 & 60947-2(ed.1);am1 & 60947-2(ed.2) & 60947-2(ed.2);am1;am2 & 60947-2(ed.3)4 `2 N3 v3 W6 q8 H: O4 w# B# x
| ( Z. G2 }' P/ C
Standard(s): IEC60947-1, IEC60947-
# h. P- g! i1 T; Z+ Q! ?! I2, IEC60947-3, {; `" d/ ~" I9 g
Sub clause(s):. l5 r S; c$ v g1 |
8.2.5.3.2 of IEC60947-1 and8 ^" `- } [7 X# C( b x
8.3.3.9 of IEC60947-2( {7 P0 O( U; N1 [- M$ u/ l
Sheet No.
* c& t' \- g8 wDSH 588" O: N. C5 U7 X3 J _% c* z ~5 M
Subject:
) p* |; F8 i. g3 ^Verification of main contact% @ d0 @( _) J6 [ r9 q$ e l
position, position of the handle# Z2 V c M7 B. ^9 z- v: w! w3 P
Key words:
; I: C6 U6 r) r3 n" h. w7 F- suitable for isolation
% e* ?, t8 w6 S+ j6 O9 `, L- indication of contact5 m! b; `/ h Y+ Y" x
position
: A$ \/ f1 G* ~- W; y9 _4 iDecision approved/ _' K1 J+ A$ `; a; G
during the CTL Plenary
- b X. W9 D' QMeeting 2006" v8 B Y/ M( ~- }* P, \6 G
Question:; [9 Z3 x* D' G- l I; I) ]/ J
Verification of the main contact position is conducted only on products suitable for isolation. This is an. m9 s. h5 m" ~% R
additional requirement to be verified. With respect to this test, the following two questions gave rise to
, P3 K( I! j7 s+ {; a3 _3 `; Sdiscussions
5 X% [& V- _# nQ1: When after the 3F test, the indicator comes to rest in a position between the trip and open position (which9 L3 p$ l" G9 V: X
is not the tripped or open position as indicated on the product), is this a pass when tested according 8.2.5.3 of7 u1 G0 u8 c- H3 \4 r
IEC60947-1?" F: p2 `7 Y3 N2 j& U
Q2: If the answer of Q1 is yes, is this in conflict with the general constructional requirements of 7.1.5 or how
D" J; X! Q' ?8 M' r* Jshould section 7.1.6.1 (additional constructional requirements) be interpreted?" \) Z8 w0 c l
Decision:
9 _% S. M. F0 J# pThere are two possibilities, depending on the features of the MCCB:6 k5 R$ b; I. i X. l
1) The indicator is the actuator, and it is the only position indicator, or
; s, O# ]* W. v$ h2) There is an actuator that may show the operating position, but in addition there is a
2 A1 I* N- \' \4 {7 |7 L fseparate position indicator.
' a* D3 E3 o6 v( w9 @% d+ KFor construction per item 1, this result is not acceptable" h& J( F' M/ A$ J0 @& I; n
For construction per item 2, the result described is acceptable if the separate position
7 E. ] y' ?& E! X, @indicator unambiguously shows the closed position, irrespective of the position of the
6 s- x8 ^" Y: n5 ~actuator.4 Y1 e2 j! {9 k! ]5 o1 l
Refer to IEC 60947-1, Clause 7.1.6.1
3 h3 i R0 q8 B+ j3 u
* R& m* W$ A8 c+ l7 K3 }' P8 F+ Q/ P* {; F! S% ]( I! c: Y
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册安规
x
|