|
| DSH 597
4 R7 O2 @( y G
, w! z; n: W2 h/ d1 h | Verificaton of main contact position, position of the actuator! j9 y) T* W. h6 d8 n% u
| 8.3.3.95 e) E4 Z8 L( `4 ]$ t; t
| 60947-1(ed.1);am1 & 60947-1(ed.2) & 60947-1(ed.2);am1;am2 & 60947-1(ed.3) & 60947-1(ed.3);am1;am2 & 60947-1(ed.3);am2 & 60947-1(ed.4) & 60947-1(ed.5) & 60947-1(ed.5);am1 & 60947-2(ed.1);am1 & 60947-2(ed.2) & 60947-2(ed.2);am1;am2 & 60947-2(ed.3) & 60947-2(ed.4) & 60947-2(ed.4);am14 o! z" R6 G/ h' J5 B( M
|
7 O# U: B4 N# h. p3 z, O) WStandard(s): IEC60947-1, IEC60947-) v- `% |" x) V! P
2
6 [$ Z8 }7 R$ `5 R% }# oSub clause(s):7 R. L) _, z5 g9 M. |
8.2.5.3 of IEC60947-1 and- \, U( d6 _3 r8 z) R4 y8 }
8.3.3.9 of IEC60947-23 j# h9 ]5 T: h- p
DSH
2 v( I8 [5 _0 P6 U- B597
; l# H- w+ _( C. ?7 bSubject:
* J( I2 v: @1 H4 d7 oVerification of main contact
7 O2 F6 X2 w' Z4 C/ w0 {position, position of the actuator
5 \ F, [, T. qKey words:
3 W+ B8 n! J; P6 ^$ K+ S- suitable for isolation
H J4 Z. r2 X7 K j3 G: o$ D" N- indication of contact. {3 H% f M: O" A& Y9 }/ d
position) X- Y- b f$ {/ K, n
Decision approved by6 F) O$ q# C8 X: ^( V, G1 @( t
the 44th CTL Plenary
8 n( r6 s9 |, y. Kmeeting 20070 M9 e4 f1 N9 x, r; Y* K' B
Question:6 P; _* B# _/ P8 n1 O
Verification of the main contact position is conducted only on products suitable for isolation. This is an, N1 v. B6 g7 w7 ]5 ~, m& g
additional requirement to be verified.
* J) |% A( S3 d! k; [0 uQ1: After the 3F test, the actuator comes to rest in a position between the trip and open position (which is3 d! E# ^0 {- }$ @# X
neither consistent with the tripped nor with the open position markings as indicated on the product). Is this a" Y6 R4 D' m$ G8 r/ w
pass when tested according 8.2.5.3 of IEC60947-1?
% U4 B! o# P! X, W. nQ2: If the answer of Q1 is yes, is this in conflict with the general constructional requirements of 7.1.5? How: O7 h- z/ J: a& l4 s8 X0 ]8 s' q
should section 7.1.6.1 (additional (constructional) requirements) be interpreted?
( ]$ o) O7 v6 d/ h# E: \$ vProposal:
3 X8 L. t7 I: J) K& jThere are two possibilities, depending on the features of the breaker:+ V% M9 j" }# t/ |% s9 t! d
1) The indicator is the actuator, and it is the only position indicator, or
, h. Q$ ^: c# N8 q# O2) There is an actuator that may show the operating position, but in addition there is a
3 g! z& O' a6 o* Y" k; h' pseparate position indicator.
/ K W$ {- z v" Q& e1 JFor construction per item 1, this result is not acceptable5 b* S5 e9 O+ T9 N6 o K! G8 `
For construction per item 2, the result described is acceptable if the separate position9 r& K+ Q: T7 \6 o0 o
indicator unambiguously shows the closed position, irrespective of the rest position of the8 k5 g% Q* {8 J1 |# q
actuator.- v9 B4 f0 K" v8 t7 ~) M5 K2 i
Refer to IEC 60947-1, Clause 7.1.6.1
3 T4 V. U! w. b; A
+ b2 \$ Y& C8 m& @0 B, `2 a& d9 r- z! _ I
8 W: N, `0 J- i |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册安规
x
|