|
| DSH 412
( c' n$ h% m+ F+ R
5 }! f0 ]$ L/ i% k; N$ v, m! ^( T | Detection of fault
4 }3 {0 z$ s% v- r% x | -
9 G3 p6 R0 i. }; _/ X2 I) _ | 60601-1(ed.2);am1;am2 }/ m/ g5 Y2 I" a5 `
| 5 k2 I/ @/ c5 K
Standard(s)- (year and edition):4 c. i) Y9 M3 a" [8 }! y
IEC 60601-1:1988 Ed.2 Am1+Am2
. J9 O6 e" v) LSub clause(s):
6 J# h% r3 d9 Z. ISheet n°: DSH-412
& u+ b* u$ ?8 nSubject: Detection of fault
0 d6 r8 f' B2 G7 bKey words: SFC, detection, fault
* b8 g% L' V/ ~( Z6 A2 `Confirmed by CTL at its 39th meeting, in Cologne; B/ Z. ^0 o# i* `8 o
Question:
% Y1 Q! }: b6 z, xShall a fault which remains undetected be considered a NORMAL CONDITION (NC) or a& ?/ q0 g8 M" K9 e9 T. _- J
SINGLE FAULT CONDITION (SFC)?
' f) j7 J8 V8 S9 ^+ O8 u: ?If every fault is considered as SFC, regardless of whether it is detected or not, the
" k; d8 O. j* |consequence will be that there is no protection required against situations where an/ F/ l; g. e1 o% @' Q( F" Y' Z
undetected first fault is followed by a second fault which may cause a SAFETY HAZARD., \$ J" ]7 k2 ] t8 Z$ g2 P/ C$ z
Decision:, o5 Z% A& E+ l, Q: ]( T7 s
If a fault is not detected (for example by periodic inspection, maintenance, auto test, etc....), it
W5 ^5 G% K5 {3 D1 Y. vshall not be considered as a SINGLE FAULT CONDITION.
3 Q- \2 @" p% M! @5 u3 ~! aTime periodicity for the detection of fault depends on the risk analysis
, ]" M' M8 D6 H# P% l# B/ |2 b
: S1 ~0 L3 U; f7 S# @4 n1 s
, g/ l1 @8 }! q! p, R! P
' U6 H3 j r6 M( _$ ~3 y9 a |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册安规
x
|