|
: w0 g( r& C, N* F
6 ?$ W9 j2 g+ z2 k, |; u% ] | Protective Impedance
G( U8 Y& t. N% Z# m& V2 _; a | 6.5.3- i% V9 j" k/ }. P9 h+ ^- k! z/ _ m
| 61010-1(ed.1);am1;am2 w: ~% Y# o- M6 D: u! F, s
|
% p# D# l' K5 ]# x) P
& r* R' a+ R1 d. eStandard:* P5 @ Q. V& h
IEC 61010-1:1990
. H; S4 q! d/ J/ A5 X" r/ p- s+A1:1992+A2:1995( i/ R, S! a( k Z& B5 }% u I
Sub clause:+ @- b. m, s# y0 I, w' S# T& [: r
6.5.3
+ z; Y; L0 H+ X/ C R6 OSheet n. 300
1 b6 h( m4 ?( O. vPage 1(1)
1 H3 l. X3 Q5 ?( A3 y4 e- E, {) XSubject:
5 i( ~: h& Y; D3 H& XProtective Impedance- \, F$ Z8 A( z* a- g6 S
Key words:
% F3 V9 M$ Y* M9 F* f! t: i4 a7 h- Shock
4 o+ f1 [6 U& w8 b( H# f7 U0 D( R/ ^- Impedance
; k- M' I1 t7 D9 p4 G- Protective
4 ]: _, @' ~; _$ gDecision taken by
8 {8 q: k* d8 O E) WETF3 and confirmed0 p1 L6 N7 E! G* r# F) Y4 i
by CTL at its 38th7 D/ \& K+ j7 Y6 M
meeting, in Toronto+ b; x5 j7 r) l- P, m; D
Question:
5 W1 y) n, }" F2 pWhere a component acts as protective impedance in single fault condition, should it be rated
$ m# \8 Y6 {9 I0 w* }for this function? An example is a component in an accessible secondary circuit which may
! y3 t* A7 U0 [( U l6 Hbe made hazardous live by the failure of a creepage or clearance distance.5 M& r4 L9 {' ~( H$ d
Decision:
! U7 w9 f& ?0 ]: e5 oSuch components should be rated for the single fault condition." ?. j1 x7 r, z& f4 t
Explanation:; n( N0 x8 @/ e$ l- q& Y
The safety of the user will be dependent on the operation of these devices. It will, however,
* \# v0 N) j1 o6 E5 O, e' vbe preferable for the design to avoid this circumstance as the integrity of the components is
$ d; y! X% o, ]* b* znot defined.6 d" V8 K; x7 s$ O& h& j) F( h
1 E( P4 h+ H* H2 N/ Q% q9 k5 w1 H0 k* g9 D; X% e
7 r- ?8 F) H8 f |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册安规
x
|