|
2 F$ d% h3 W* @- j
; f5 d0 R; V8 a& Q* |: P
DSH 337. w ^; ]% G! M$ e4 o, v8 n. L
| Integrity of clearances and creepage distances
. p$ R4 x8 ?7 P8 s: @9 v6 I+ w | 10.1
( G# _% R3 ?3 i7 C w, v3 u0 A | 61010-1(ed.1);am1;am2% l& O8 |. `# E2 z* T& y2 P
| ! b+ B4 Q- N( q3 H* i7 n! Q- k
; B/ n" V" K0 ?0 dStandard: q" w: F! z+ M
IEC 61010-1:1990 +A1:1992 + A2
1 |! N# b8 o* I( m:1995
# G% k, O8 G' W" f% @! ~Sub clause:1 M; q1 ?4 n5 \" y; q
10.1
3 [7 v( [+ V! P& t4 X4 ^; g$ M" eSheet n. 337- {5 j8 T& @. R) `( U- o3 _
Page 1(1)
- c. I* ?/ |8 b; @Subject:
e9 U' }. w e& \1 \* R' yIntegrity of clearances and
4 X( Q J- j. s3 ycreepage distances
9 T' w9 @3 d6 c1 L% X* M" z# PKey words:- R9 L6 ]3 s5 I) c
- Clearances distances
W* w9 X3 R$ X' X/ u) c' d1 U9 i0 i2 `- Creepage distances+ G# M6 A, g0 o7 Y# `0 ?5 @
Decision n. 23 taken at
1 T* {/ v$ Z3 p _, d% |37th meeting/2000: d- J7 l/ O3 @) s' h. v# r+ |
Question:
8 q* g. u9 m7 d4 V% oStrict interpretation does implicate a lot of test work.& {/ i+ ]# [4 Z ?
How is this clause considered for compliance? n8 T4 A' r8 k) E
This question is from CTL.! |5 H: e: i/ i) p* a& A* l# a
Decision:8 Z7 n% d, F' T5 X l
See Explanatory Notes
6 m. n9 O9 E5 _" z* D7 \Explanatory Notes:1 l! O; \- j5 V9 O, a3 ]: i
The compliance requirements suggest that, in case of doubt additional tests are required to, B( f5 R( L! Q, A+ X
ensure the integrity. Where examination of the data and the test results cause concern then. u, ]) I8 @/ |0 R" L/ j) o
further tests are needed at 40°C ambient followed by measurements of the concerned area for
T" Q- `; Y8 F7 nthe creepage and clearance distances.- f3 V, @6 ?, r6 N& e
* Y# L4 V; @# [! n7 ?6 }. q* T2 A1 ~7 G' c! K
7 f& z2 |. |6 v |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|