|
" w" }, Y' i" M8 s" G
$ U; }" z. @# N) i, s3 k
| Identification
: L- B l, Y5 ], m$ K$ m | 5.1.28 V9 V% R' Q; y: R% u
| 61010-1(ed.1);am1;am2
" B8 p! y3 T+ A. T0 d3 @ |
+ ^( I7 U q1 ~1 e$ ~ X
8 Y p, {, S( b+ N- b+ @4 `Standard:
3 C8 z' d |1 ?, pIEC 61010-1:1990 +A1:1992 + A2
r: I% k! A+ j) m0 I! m3 j:1995
! E+ B5 A& O' R( ^ pSub clause:; N- v6 g: W8 W5 `# g. r
5.1.2- O& [* F& \$ Y7 W x
Sheet n. 362% E7 L0 w( q, N/ Q9 k& T
Page 1(1)
5 R( ^, V) Y$ y0 m6 J2 d. ^) LSubject: P/ ~- T% k9 f: i4 y
Identification
. K% l1 b% g( m8 S! B. z6 KKey words:
# b% [) j0 B3 Z3 J+ v; O0 z- Manufacturer’s name( N; |+ C" e6 M2 ^" J- i
- Trade mark
& i3 i1 I5 e: i- Agent/Supplier$ N7 T& _ J. e( x/ u( W
Decision taken by8 Q- S8 I( b- u4 `: J
ETF3 and confirmed
3 W" h) S. w% H* r* u: B+ Fby CTL at its 38th
- r& m, D$ @) U' K* Gmeeting, in Toronto4 N& a- B+ {- ^
Question:
4 M9 S- \9 M( Z! m% XManufacturer's name or registered trade mark. Is manufacturer's agent/supplier name
- ^' g! I6 i7 D$ q" B& r% Wacceptable as an alternative for identification?
0 ?2 K8 r& ^6 r, }! `Decision:
) y% N- h6 s, BIn the absence of a definition for “manufacturer” in IEC61010-1, it was decided that only. b w; t- N/ v* y; V2 o! {
manufacturer’s name is acceptable under this sub-clause.$ ~2 [& m ^; h, H' l$ |+ N8 W
% D# `$ G5 h/ M( p
, p9 ^* b6 I* @) x+ m3 }5 i
1 j9 K+ e" v! a& A: w! ^2 ]+ A |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|