|
+ N2 g. `1 F0 `5 Q/ R7 h
& w4 u& H6 }6 p, b, p$ y; ~
| Comparative tracking Index/ N( [/ \: B5 d2 B2 k, ^% P/ c
| Tables in Annex D. u6 V! W: r1 j& d, k4 w
| 61010-1(ed.1);am1;am2
{/ x# @: x0 [+ H$ C& a |
) @$ A' `+ C5 r( j5 Z
3 M% Q& n5 d2 l6 |/ H9 u+ J: QStandard:
3 q6 o( k8 l* @, r5 g8 f8 e/ V3 \IEC 61010-1:1990 +A1:1992 + A2
, \* K& \( k/ X) s. z$ i/ x! \:1995/ r# E# q8 v1 z
Sub clause:( M, B+ B% F, q U6 \3 d+ n! i
Tables in Annex D
# E) I* h; o; gSheet n. 3694 H) w/ p6 H4 [* b5 a; ?, Y6 s
Page 1(1)( M' O; B w( G: W4 ^: r
Subject:
$ O9 v/ k% ]/ Q. u9 ^. UComparative Tracking Index
$ ]+ `; d8 Y" cKey words:
8 r+ X2 o$ u0 _7 j0 H- [: o& O. b- CTI values
- M, l4 }: t" Z" s7 O& t1 |- Manufacturer’s claim
! u- |( A* W% Y! s8 vDecision taken by
5 X9 w' G1 a: d8 V7 E4 l1 METF3 and confirmed6 X9 \. U% j" i) g4 D4 M
by CTL at its 38th
5 h* a1 C! w( w- o# Smeeting, in Toronto
7 }' f% `6 {9 C( XQuestions :
5 Y$ [2 \1 s. Q& ^# C) Y0 O8 h& A1. Is the manufacturer's declaration regarding the CTI values acceptable by Test Houses?4 L* P/ B. w# }2 s, \
2.Is a single test for the CTI value acceptable?
2 C+ p% Z& m9 m' |. _2 N1 \$ r3.Which CTI value is to be used when no value tested or declared, for example for PCB's?6 [3 e( |: n, H% _/ i/ X, x
Decision:
2 ^& J2 o/ I4 Y" l- W" u4 ?1. The manufacturer’s claim is not adequate and must be backed by an independent test& [7 _/ j$ d' J p" X
report/certificate from a recognised test house.% \( V, ~% e; n* m. a4 I# m
2. No testing considered necessary if the material is approved and fit for purpose. However3 F7 [* A) Y+ R# r0 _- M
if not approved than single test is not acceptable.5 z3 W# y/ H9 _5 K: o/ d
3. The least favourable value, for example CTI value of < 100.9 @ N" n$ a5 ~ E2 g/ h, ?
1 @% B4 X1 j/ S, _! ]6 n' K: b4 C8 Q9 x5 c6 Q8 X4 @ w$ f
. A& }7 L: G7 y7 h- G
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|