|
| PDSH 1011/ o8 x+ `' ~, U7 {- \# H( X
| Annex B
1 V8 d! x, u, j& b R | Annex B
* T+ [5 G! t4 V$ [ | 61347-1(ed.1);am1 & 61347-1(ed.2);am1 & 61347-2-9(ed.1);am1;am2
9 c& a( p; q0 }1 T8 T0 S r |
* ? a. s* S9 F# ?Standard(s):
4 d) F: y& f- fIEC 61347-1
0 e8 q0 F" t3 ~- F5 w1 I) WIEC 61347-2-9 All editions
1 u& P7 Z9 g0 x2 Z& b& ASubclause(s): Annex B
8 \! s; q6 X( a" B% BNo. Year PDSH 1011 2010: ~5 L# x, |. H# n
Category: LITE Developed by: ETF5 OSM/LUM# c, L9 k' \$ V+ n+ E! r
Subject:8 T4 M% w8 D; C* [4 \: {
Annex B
8 D( E; q( G$ j; dKey words:
. {; l$ H' u' Z V. ?! Q5 J- Discharge lamps2 P+ x3 `9 a3 D4 U+ H
- Thermal protector* u& ^% b1 d& I% s7 J* p; s9 {
- IEC 60730-2-9: e) D& h2 T. K7 ?; \1 {
To be approved at the 49th CTL Plenary Meeting, in 20126 V* W* @+ }. F7 e
Question:
% F W2 `7 }( Z' {& UWould it would be acceptable that a thermally protected ballast for discharge lamps (according to Annex$ q* s- t4 M% s" ~3 E
B of IEC 61347-2-9), include a thermal protector control according to IEC 60730-2-9 instead of a thermal- ^5 u, ? u9 u) `2 W9 Y! s
protector in compliance with IEC 60730-2-3?- f: J) u N2 C1 P/ b8 E% v2 r
Decision:
* U6 Y- ]8 ?, `6 @) H+ ^' B3 @+ INo. Reference to IEC 60730-2-9 is not acceptable.& M: k( N1 y/ g3 e
4 P# O. z7 ]+ U9 x" H) @/ i- X
1 F2 T" v0 k6 x% F$ F |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|