|
| PDSH 994: E7 c! y6 L: k! a/ y
; N y# Z& g2 p9 u
| Endurance test for built-in ignitors in the rectifying test circuit* h+ B; D, I& L7 B3 C4 E9 y4 p. J, F
| 12.1 – 12.2& \3 E* O6 U" Q, o& E/ @# h2 m
| 60927(ed.3)
: x: R3 N/ I, w8 T& A; h- A# S |
0 N. q/ g8 r) H' q- }: gStandard(s):6 K0 S- ?1 @' L6 q5 A! r
IEC 60927/2007; G6 `& V: z& ]* H, L* R# @
Subclause(s):( H$ M$ O( K% G9 ^& q/ Y
12.1 – 12.24 h( `$ \. L$ G( ^% P
No. Year PDSH 0994 2010, P) r4 x# V- ?, L7 Z0 T5 p& N
Category: LITE Developed by: ETF5 OSM/LUM
- ^# d' T: b4 ` H7 I# t# ?( cSubject:
7 y# A, r" n/ J. V$ R, p4 x6 R& aEndurance test for built-in ignitors in the rectifying test circuit% X9 }1 `0 ^% I- s7 {% D( F
Key words:
8 |% t! d- e: h8 |3 K& @0 @- Test quantity
( G7 ^5 @6 l7 n- Additional ignitors
8 N" v- \# d: i+ C* u& v, O) E1 }- 30 days q% e- ^; G3 C9 l
To be approved at the 49th CTL Plenary Meeting, in 2012$ u2 ]2 o/ F- `- L! P+ u/ k
Question:
$ ]5 l% l* k$ u, N3 P; P1) According to the § 12.1 of IEC 60927/A1 the test quantity shall consist of two additional ignitors for
5 F* v+ S: R# i6 W$ Nthe test as specified in the third paragraph of 12.2:
1 H$ K' `9 c S" h: d$ C“Ignitors intended to be connected in series with discharge lamps which could, according to the
9 I5 ?. e5 g4 x& \" a& F8 ^" dspecification lead to ballast / ignitor overheating, are tested additionally under conditions with maximum
$ J& X0 w/ F* t) S( B0 U; Wcase temperature brought to (tc + X)°C and with rectifying test circuit in accordance with IEC 60598-1 V8 I2 B9 Q$ b* B$ Z" _' a' j
Edition, § 12.5 and Annex C”.
& m \8 r2 z. {5 [7 {" k1 ~In doing so, if we test ignitors intended to be built-in, without replaceable switching elements, the ignitors
2 f0 f/ u y- }- i% Vshall be subjected to 30 days continuous operations so that the lamp current is adjusted to maximum (by# H1 X/ R% @# c* P9 K% q
varying the resistor R2), but in any case not higher than three times the normal lamp current. The test
, V% ?. s0 `# \# z- u2 [voltage is 1,06 times the rated supply voltage of the ballast. Our experience shows that some ignitors, R5 i) K! w* M! J
reach the maximum case temperature at room temperature in this circuit, when they are placed on a& C0 v1 B# h) X/ I
wood board. Can the test be performed in this arrangement and the type accepted if after the test both) ] Q# g3 n6 A3 C
ignitors comply with the relevant requirements? If the answer is no, how shall the test be performed?
& F0 a, B( f; _- y2) Is it acceptable that the marking point for tc and (tc + X) would be at different places on the ignitor?8 {0 C ]7 R9 l; O1 h
Decision:+ V/ Y# ]; h+ v. n2 }5 Q. C- X& _
1) Yes.
/ E' ?, p' x1 q+ e2) No.) ]3 G1 _/ d u( |" e$ I3 E
5 f9 @8 p+ J t5 }) e* s" j$ s
: X& V) x7 C3 q' {4 X+ t" Y8 z( t5 D; z# O) J E+ y! Z
# M6 J4 Q0 e) u" I8 x) H; q1 F; m |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|