|
| DSH 568
+ i/ _1 \$ R- K D. N, m; c; `$ T5 K9 V( h+ z: c$ _
| Varistors (VDR’s) across the mains
3 q! o$ z& b- C1 ~4 L; s | 19.11
' ]4 [+ @6 a& I | 60335-1(ed.4)
( {$ O/ d! o7 l0 r |
# f+ o2 ?0 o# I* CQuestion:4 V: T6 X( k, E- G ~
Reports from different Testing Laboratories and clients expose essential differences in interpretation and testing practice between laboratories and/or Certification Bodies.
) X. u4 W: `) t# B# oActually, the practice of one Certification Body is now being a market factor.
4 H0 D4 V( m1 ^$ MBased on above concerns we ask for clarification:
! k2 i1 q8 i# w2 Y" g1: Shall Cl. 19.11 be strictly followed or can solutions given under 2. be accepted.
9 B, X' b0 q+ `) v: f4 d# Y2: Can any of the decisions (made by OSM/EE) be accepted?
& n* |+ U+ A" X% H- A: VDR’s across the mains are accepted if the VDR is separately certified according to IEC 61051-1 or according to CECC 42200.
$ E, C: ]0 }$ O- B: VDR across the mains with a protective device to guard against short-circuit is acceptable.9 l) L) W! I$ Y6 d7 o
- C: If A and B are acceptable, should, because of the fact that VDR’s may burn or burst during life-time due to an increasing temperature stress caused by increase of leakage current with a number of switching cycles in the VDR, a thermal interrupting device on the VDR connected in series with the VDR be required.
. O2 z& K3 \# T; w m, p+ FDecision:
: W& o' [- }; T+ |7 l+ E/ }1. VDR’s are not short-circuited if they are used within their manufacturer’s declared specification, when tested according to Sub-clause 19.11.2 of IEC60335-1(1991).
7 d3 P H6 F* b% Z$ ?2. VDR’s are short-circuited regardless of compliance with IEC61051-1, when tested according to Subclause 19.11.2 of IEC60335-1(2001).
[% b) x% t' J$ {& C2 V$ F
" L4 h0 K7 ?" o( S$ v6 M V. @. e% S+ i
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|