|
| DSH 588
7 x3 x) _+ j4 d7 F! {
6 j( d1 P. ~& c# S( P6 @3 v | Verification of main contact position, position of the handle* J, f. d2 q. E" O3 g, o
| 8.2.5.3.2 of IEC60947-1 and 8.3.3.9 of IEC60947-2* Y7 ~: s/ {6 p. t9 }/ v
| 60947-1(ed.1);am1 & 60947-1(ed.2) & 60947-1(ed.2);am1;am2 & 60947-1(ed.3) & 60947-1(ed.3);am1;am2 & 60947-1(ed.3);am2 & 60947-1(ed.4) & 60947-1(ed.5) & 60947-1(ed.5);am1 & 60947-2(ed.1);am1 & 60947-2(ed.2) & 60947-2(ed.2);am1;am2 & 60947-2(ed.3)) ?& o9 U% v' J' f6 T% w
| ! E$ C) p _/ f9 V9 A8 C
Standard(s): IEC60947-1, IEC60947-# }1 {: I2 T% D" x4 @3 S$ p' X& O
2, IEC60947-39 m6 z# V, `/ e4 D
Sub clause(s):
8 D' d2 f5 u7 L, z5 b( P( ^8.2.5.3.2 of IEC60947-1 and% N0 `. [" B; \- I3 S
8.3.3.9 of IEC60947-2
2 t/ C6 o+ M, p3 R, X) ?0 J9 ASheet No.
* u2 y$ ]. J' Y# D$ ?2 RDSH 5887 ~; K3 M& O/ W4 D/ ~/ \/ E
Subject:0 A4 I: r& w5 i- h
Verification of main contact
% C( z% F, R" J7 D9 `0 R3 p( sposition, position of the handle
1 [3 _; Z+ n2 o7 mKey words:- {9 T9 |6 A8 {. A
- suitable for isolation
2 z3 X4 e' {' X" q4 l$ B! k! t( w- indication of contact/ v: ~+ ^$ C5 ?# ~( k
position) a; F& j5 e9 k( d, M; h
Decision approved2 c2 ~# C1 \1 p9 B/ H5 s- Y
during the CTL Plenary* l' m# u8 U2 T- v/ l& l1 T
Meeting 2006
9 y) b" a6 y% Z0 o1 x9 @# {7 nQuestion:
- }& D4 F8 v- Q7 e( nVerification of the main contact position is conducted only on products suitable for isolation. This is an! Y% l+ M1 T% [6 n1 z
additional requirement to be verified. With respect to this test, the following two questions gave rise to
$ {- F8 S# _: p2 ?discussions
* U; v2 ^' U3 m) P8 e tQ1: When after the 3F test, the indicator comes to rest in a position between the trip and open position (which
. K& B% _+ y% s5 d/ @is not the tripped or open position as indicated on the product), is this a pass when tested according 8.2.5.3 of; T. H3 v! |8 n# d- J4 v
IEC60947-1?$ a& @: H: H7 u2 j
Q2: If the answer of Q1 is yes, is this in conflict with the general constructional requirements of 7.1.5 or how
1 ?/ H/ I& Y. Y( lshould section 7.1.6.1 (additional constructional requirements) be interpreted?- J( t6 b( H+ f2 B4 [
Decision:
. U3 k! i' R% XThere are two possibilities, depending on the features of the MCCB:1 j' m- n4 ]# _, \
1) The indicator is the actuator, and it is the only position indicator, or
0 e# i# }$ S+ r+ u2) There is an actuator that may show the operating position, but in addition there is a, w5 C+ ]1 [6 |" s6 y& h. J
separate position indicator.
8 j! [2 `2 y; ` R9 lFor construction per item 1, this result is not acceptable
2 p( ]5 Y7 J' O+ |$ d, |$ `+ lFor construction per item 2, the result described is acceptable if the separate position6 Q3 n4 C% Z9 u; P% d
indicator unambiguously shows the closed position, irrespective of the position of the
6 F2 y4 y/ ~7 x4 Oactuator.
( H) h# W: P* g1 Q. ?! U; j3 R/ p! VRefer to IEC 60947-1, Clause 7.1.6.1
& M8 q1 Z8 H/ ^$ t: s) d( C( f
1 ~5 Z$ j+ R. H8 v! U$ D# y
- h* \; w8 \8 w. r: q. ~ |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册安规
x
|