|
本帖最后由 清水白菜 于 2012-10-29 16:08 编辑
) i! T. d; h# D( O3 L% X) s3 H6 H
; i( S3 N4 y$ z q3 q: P- YTest Name | Test Method | Units | Tested (mm) | Value | Flammability | ISO 9773, IEC 60695-11-10 | Class (color) | 0.08 | VTM-2 (NC) | | | | 0.13 | VTM-0 (NC, BK) | | | | 0.25 | VTM-0 (NC, BK) | | | | 0.51 | VTM-0 (NC, BK) | | | | 0.63 | V-0 (ALL) | | | | 3.0 | V-0 (ALL) |
Glow-Wire Flammability (GWFI) | IEC 60695-2-12 | C | - | - | Glow-Wire Ignition (GWIT) | IEC 60695-2-13 | C | - | - | IEC Comparative Tracking Index | IEC 60112 | Volts (Max) | - | - | IEC Ball Pressure | IEC 60695-10-2 | C | - | - | ISO Heat Deflection (1.80 MPa) | ISO 75-2 | C | - | - | ISO Tensile Strength | ISO 527-2 | MPa | - | - | ISO Flexural Strength | ISO 178 | MPa | - | - | ISO Tensile Impact | ISO 8256 | kJ/m2 | - | - | ISO Izod Impact | ISO 180 | kJ/m2 | - | - | ISO Charpy Impact | ISO 179-2 | kJ/m2 | - | - |
! o- h( |: h' n1 J( d. {$ R
* s$ I4 T& Q7 |$ o9 o" E- CTest Name | Test Method | Units | Tested (mm) | Value | Flammability | IEC 60695-11-10, IEC 60695-11-20 | Class (color) | 0.75 | V-1 (BK) | | | | 1.5 | V-0 (BK) | | | | 2.5 | V-0, 5VA (BK) | | | | 3.0 | V-0, 5VA (BK |
Glow-Wire Flammability (GWFI) | IEC 60695-2-12 | C | - | - | Glow-Wire Ignition (GWIT) | IEC 60695-2-13 | C | - | - | IEC Comparative Tracking Index | IEC 60112 | Volts (Max) | - | - | IEC Ball Pressure | IEC 60695-10-2 | C | - | - | ISO Heat Deflection (1.80 MPa) | ISO 75-2 | C | - | - | ISO Tensile Strength | ISO 527-2 | MPa | - | - | ISO Flexural Strength | ISO 178 | MPa | - | - | ISO Tensile Impact | ISO 8256 | kJ/m2 | - | - | ISO Izod Impact | ISO 180 | kJ/m2 | - | - | ISO Charpy Impact | ISO 179-2 | kJ/m2 | - | - |
$ N: g1 o% j. V% I5 M, a6 c* |- b) p. g0 ], B- d
以上可见Flammability这一项测试标准不一样,相关标准要求的厚度不一样;' ?! Y& V. H; g) R$ w5 C& `7 b
60950-1里有说到Flammability可以等效互换(见加粗部分), 电气和机械强度方面要具体考虑。
1 w% T! T: `7 ^& ~$ b. z4 l/ q: o2 FNOTE 1 When applying the requirements in this standard, HF-1 CLASS FOAMED MATERIAL is regarded as better than
; i. Y: P/ c3 R1 QHF-2 CLASS, and HF-2 CLASS better than HBF CLASS.* n, t% x! T: G
NOTE 2 Similarly, material of 5VA CLASS is regarded as better than 5VB CLASS, 5VB CLASS better than V-0 CLASS,
0 a+ L5 V9 l/ A3 j: Z# c: W/ F& H9 p# XV-0 CLASS better than V-1 CLASS, V-1 CLASS better than V-2 CLASS, V-2 CLASS better than HB40 CLASS and! S% z5 y& L/ t: l8 d9 F
HB40 CLASS better than HB75 CLASS.9 H$ X/ f. R' G7 k% [
NOTE 3 Similarly, MATERIAL of VTM-0 CLASS is regarded as better than VTM-1 CLASS and VTM-1 CLASS better than
: S* f, M; p' w* h0 BVTM-2 CLASS.! b) j4 @! S% L+ }1 g+ |
NOTE 4 VTM-0 CLASS, VTM-1 CLASS and VTM-2 CLASS MATERIALS are considered to be equivalent to V-0 CLASS,$ L+ \3 }( \% ^4 c
V-1 CLASS and V-2 CLASS MATERIALS, respectively, but only for their flammability properties. Their electrical and
. P" U3 _9 s* X0 k8 L5 V- ?7 fmechanical properties are not necessarily equivalent.* E2 k- D8 ~7 h$ u: A
NOTE 5 Certain flammability classes have replaced the classes used in earlier editions of this standard. The
( K1 D4 J! z. o; E6 {) N( u6 }equivalence of the old and the new classes is shown in Table 1B.1 Y4 [9 X3 ^5 J# G9 H
|
|