|
. N- Q+ x: S% Y# ]2 D; o: Q' k7 q1 U3 Z5 P$ t" X
| Integrity of clearances and creepage distances
" |3 q) g/ M) E1 K1 S; {- X$ T6 e6 O3 N | 10.1
1 g3 e4 O7 n; `( P | 61010-1(ed.1);am1;am2
" m, C1 r) c8 Z e. | |
; R1 G7 p8 A) q! K$ x! M# \9 J4 [' ^ Q2 ~ h
Standard:
7 v, r8 p( G* g0 d/ r. m8 pIEC 61010-1:1990 +A1:1992 + A2
S* V0 [7 T% M# P# }* Y:1995: K* v; S; V; |
Sub clause:
: _6 P5 v- X' X% R2 X10.1
2 a6 n7 A! e P! `& j1 QSheet n. 337$ t0 p( d8 f3 E+ P
Page 1(1)
4 \) G; Z) G+ c' `7 {+ JSubject:
7 J+ m: b; H& Z, u( j. d- e, UIntegrity of clearances and$ y, ]+ I! a, e$ w( O, F4 c( q
creepage distances( c% V# a. Q/ y8 L
Key words:% z: g8 t; S6 d t
- Clearances distances
9 T) \7 J* ?+ Q$ x- Creepage distances+ Z9 h4 N3 ]% b5 D/ f- I% q
Decision n. 23 taken at P2 C% h2 [! u' V3 m l
37th meeting/2000
4 f- r, [+ ^; ]/ V, w. wQuestion:
! G. ~ j4 z" lStrict interpretation does implicate a lot of test work.
2 r. {9 Z, G( Q; ~ P" ZHow is this clause considered for compliance?
) G" H' |" G$ e5 ~$ k% ]This question is from CTL.
1 T2 `1 _5 n: _) T* c. a0 zDecision:
8 E: p; f' ` K0 o5 m1 ?! hSee Explanatory Notes, @9 L! [: B, u1 \. c
Explanatory Notes:9 B8 M* o, _6 ~' D3 v
The compliance requirements suggest that, in case of doubt additional tests are required to
9 j! v: e5 \8 V9 yensure the integrity. Where examination of the data and the test results cause concern then
% m( }2 z6 R- H7 I3 Tfurther tests are needed at 40°C ambient followed by measurements of the concerned area for5 h7 f# U) Y2 a2 b- k
the creepage and clearance distances.
( v: p# C) P. @- K7 d0 Q
$ J2 \. h! @+ o- p% q/ i( w; y4 v' d1 V- D- H9 w( S& f
1 g1 K( M0 |! {2 @* O
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|