|
| DSH 753
* O4 U! k# X' M4 I0 Y5 D$ [9 H" x ` Q( d. v, ~" r
| Capacitor discharge voltage measurement. P5 C' `8 f; \* G% @' Y% a$ |: @( H
| 9.1.6 (IEC60065/2001) 6.10.3 (IEC61010-1/2001)
5 \4 V" ^8 V* m( k6 R | 61010-1(ed.2) & 60065(ed.7), `3 a% ^+ P# m+ S; f
| ( {0 ]% W3 N. \2 ]6 h
Standard(s): No. Year
E. V8 q' Y6 `' w. wIEC60065/2001
$ l4 w) M& r3 t' ], W5 ?IEC61010-1/2001
5 F, J2 [/ ?; x9 a6 |" UDSH 0753
2 k, y7 T( F. T. x$ }2009
; l8 ?3 y. p; j- t/ @Category:
1 s; ]1 z+ j' J) D% W+ u3 h9 FTRON, MEAS
# N4 P8 X' }! O/ eSubclause(s):' G' u) y( v1 y' e
9.1.67 B) P- I8 G# b) A, k2 w" }0 z; c
6.10.34 t# w3 A# J- ~( f6 A: ]: S: \& B( ?
Developed by:6 g5 y: b; S; f+ i+ Y6 N! u
WG4, ETF2, ETF3
$ r( h3 n* P' t" ]* ]Subject:
5 m: z( G8 ]" a1 MCapacitor discharge7 _' N% g# Z3 Q' S( @
voltage measurement
. Q& f* Q' K& ?3 ]% k. F, z& mKey words:
% Z9 U; |0 u/ w O8 ~- Plug discharge+ O Q/ w8 i/ F" l4 x$ i* z
- Capacitor discharge- x) K/ V: l4 U3 b( q
- Shock hazard
[5 o. d6 v# V& b u2 E! ~; m+ \Approved at the 47th CTL
/ L& \7 G7 _* S1 G/ K5 M' i! R% NPlenary Meeting, year 2010% e# d/ E: @ Y
Question:6 ^; f7 ~- d, o' D
The standards referenced include a test commonly referred to as a plug discharge or capacitor3 J6 y4 j$ ]$ P* h, S& ^# P5 V! @
discharge test that involves disconnecting the product under test from the mains and
- C; `/ x! V' Y0 ` hmeasuring the residual voltage across a capacitor(s) at a specified time. The intent in each of
# m' D/ n0 U$ Vthe referenced standards is the same – measure the maximum voltage obtainable at the time0 | |0 H: K$ h/ b; R
specified.0 k) v; \" r, g5 I
(1) Each standard has a slightly different description of how the mains disconnect is made, but
2 E% M- l1 f9 Kthe intent is to disconnect at the highest voltage possible in the AC power cycle. With the4 L6 v4 z! g( x+ m
advent of electronic voltage sensing switches, it is possible to disconnect at the peak voltage in
6 k# U# m: B) B( ]the AC cycle. Using this procedure seems to be within the intent of the standards and would
2 k2 j6 @9 q7 ]# _8 f w! Jresult in more consistent and repeatable results. Is it acceptable to perform the test this way?6 T0 @8 c7 }8 n0 z, i
(2) Good laboratory practice dictates that the voltage should be measured with a high input
. V& _/ }: b2 O n: x# s) t- Vimpedance voltmeter. For this test, some standards require the use of a voltmeter with an input
9 W2 E" \& w, E. T+ ^% \resistance of 100 M 1 ± 5 M 1 in parallel with an input capacitance of 25 pF or less. For more
5 ? d* j5 G R3 [1 |' Z6 O3 ~consistent and repeatable results should this type of meter always be used for this type of test?9 |5 Y- k; y# s0 j
Decision:
( {4 n% L8 w0 B, a+ U+ H(1) Yes, this method should always be used for these tests within the CB Scheme.
2 G! a) S' m; ]* [( Y- R(2) Yes, a meter with the stated input impedance should always be used for these tests within
% c3 M7 Q% Q2 t3 q7 f: A% ~the CB Scheme.
4 S. G- I) i% v7 _! P% v( }
' g$ ]8 Z* _3 L! D
6 X' b8 V( G+ R* L |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|