|
| DSH 436# B+ [9 H+ C2 G$ _% G& S
5 c- D$ F) ~+ w
| Verification of the rated residual making and breaking capacity IDm
$ P6 b( \1 n, r4 X$ g. B4 L8 g9 q | 9.11.2.3: S6 B6 W' Q. H2 x9 }( F7 R2 ?; ~
| 61008-1(ed.2)6 ]; o5 L4 S( Q$ R0 Q- b) i0 x G
| * a) \3 J# _0 n3 f7 A ^
Standard:
& T+ o- f; L* _& L! iIEC 61008-1 (1996-12)
! t7 O# X! e; E% x8 J% g5 eSub clause:
4 m& U' z1 i1 K& |" S9.11.2.3
- u$ ^- T2 G: }( USheet No. 436. d. \! b2 Q8 u5 {
Subject:& l2 S+ s ~6 b# a5 l' {: v
Verification of the rated residual
- ]2 x( K. o# xmaking and breaking capacity IDm0 S, K3 W4 \) Y( N: x/ B
Key words: Confirmed at 39th
1 D& v; j' d2 T. g2 v- dCTL Meeting% l2 q4 h6 h3 n
Question:
9 P! P K; n1 J6 i# k E! h/ F9.11.2.3 refers to the test conditions prescribed in 9.11.2.1 and states that the resistor R3 shall
- k+ w5 A7 m8 A; L. Znot be used.
& r; t4 d/ ?/ G9.11.2.1 require the test circuits according to figures 5 to 9 together with resistor R2 to be used. F1 w/ _- T$ |
According to these figures, the following inconsistency appears:
) \" R' ~. f' w& eFor a single pole switch (with two current paths) normally rated for 230 V, the rated residual
4 Y+ [/ f1 p9 b- c+ H: u& p$ k; y& C' Tmaking and breaking capacity has to be tested at 230 V.1 P% x$ ]( }/ _8 f0 C( K. _; l
For a two pole switch normally rated for 400 V, the rated residual making and breaking7 f- k- H$ C8 x) I6 w
capacity has to be tested at 400 V.
# ?( J9 {! j E7 FFor a three pole switch normally rated for 400 V, the rated residual making and breaking% ~# N7 p5 @5 a4 r, y7 N* k/ m& D
capacity has to be tested at 400 V." c! a, |4 |: f& u6 g4 y
For a three pole switch with four current paths and for a four pole switch normally rated for
, x4 S. J4 R! B' Y400 V, the rated residual making and breaking capacity has to be tested at 230 V.
2 E" l5 R. l. e' G8 d% W, L& YDue to the fact that the purpose of this test is not to cover the special fault conditions in IT-systems,
" `& _' J1 T/ ~% Q# Q" Tthe test voltage for this verification of the rated residual making and breaking capacity should be
* O7 z+ C2 C# a; u6 i; ~9 M230 V, independent of the number of poles, and the relevant figures should be corrected.
( Y+ |6 g. c) Y4 bDecision taken at the SC23E WG2 meeting in Nice, October 2001:6 q3 f% }2 j+ S4 C" h9 E; M8 _
Extract from the minutes IEC SC23E_WG2_006:
: R4 m: ]5 {4 NSC23E_WG2_010 request from Austria to update 61008 clause 9.11.2.36 x: G0 i. l9 `8 G) K
The proposal made by Mr Bachl was considered justified and accepted. During the meeting
# u- z& t4 `6 e E3 e" H7 n* D4 UWG2 decided that laboratories and certification bodies should be informed about this
8 A3 v" L# d: v: O2 W2 Jimportant decision.0 J* u1 z2 L6 p: I/ C5 P
Therefore the following statement was drafted:
% T! a4 l9 y1 f# j' x. q( c+ Q8 \2
+ Y( `0 }! w5 h2 c! a6 |Decision to be forwarded to CTL:
) K' Q- D1 `6 [IEC SC23E WG2 decided to correct the inconsistent test requirement in IEC 61008-1 (1996-12), subclause
7 G2 e0 `) t) c: Z9 P. [& N+ T9.11.2.3 and in IEC 61009-1 (1996-12), subclause 9.12.13 - Verification of the rated residual
& M! e: T% R& G$ ~making and breaking capacity IDm.
7 t% m1 T* ~0 |* t1 wThe test voltage for this verification of the rated residual making and breaking capacity should be the
% S7 {5 y5 G$ M; Iline to neutral voltage, independent of the number of poles of the RCCB or RCBO. This correction will
% e6 X% x8 K! ^: c! g, S2 l4 Ybe included in the next amendment or revision of IEC 61008-1 and IEC 61009-1.5 A' G- Y8 a4 ?, s! C
The revised test circuit (fig. 7) proposed for the standard is attached.) {* p6 _9 O) _9 u1 \5 U
1 {# s: A& F% U* Q( B. g0 U3 l( v
# u4 B& z6 E' H# B! g: H. d5 u
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|