DSH 437 Verification of the rated residual making and breaking capacity ID m

小米

广东安规检测
有限公司提供：

小型摆管淋雨试验机

IPX5X6X7喷水试验机

1000L恒温恒湿箱

各种试验指现货

可程式恒温恒湿试验箱

水平垂直燃烧机

自动卷线器试验机

耐划痕试验机

各种灯头量规现货

灼热丝试验机现货

GB1002插头量规

IPX1-X7淋雨现货

IEC61347/UL935镇流器热试验箱

灯具防风罩

IK冲击试验机

UL498插头插座量规

VDE0620插头插座量规

稳定性试验台

家电温升测试角

针焰试验机现货

热电偶焊机现货

家电125mm试验指

E12灯头量规

无绳壶无绳电熨斗插拔寿命试验机

IEC60335试验指甲

DSH 437 1 Z( S; U! W- c+ `6 {0 k

Verification of the rated residual making and breaking capacity ID m 7 W% f8 Z% V$ q0 z' Q( }

9.12.13 : L+ A1 n+ R1 N1 ?* X; n& W

61009-1(ed.2)

7 t) p" a7 o( }Standard:
IEC 61009-1 (1996-12)
Sub clause:
9.12.13
1 q) _! w9 q: u  ESheet No. 437
Subject
Verification of the rated residual
9 g0 O' ^& F, [, G" ]) J7 Jmaking and breaking capacity IDm
* ]# o  A+ H+ jKey words: Confirmed at CTL
39th Meeting
Question:
9.12.13.1 refers to the test conditions prescribed in 9.12.1 and states that the impedance Z1 shall
% U7 r/ Z7 ~% P4 e) Z7 j) v' Q; F4 Fnot be used.
% y! v, f' k; U9.12.1 refers to the conditions in 9.12.1 to 9.12.12.
! T& `/ s9 B$ ~4 U0 l. H% A. `9.12.2 and 9.12.7.4 require the test circuits according to figures 5 to 9 together with impedance
Z2 to be used.
; t1 H$ \. M! J( i" i1 C$ J9 CAccording to these figures the following inconsistency appears:
8 n6 d* M3 `3 H. m: o; \4 R4 y& uFor a single pole switch (with two current paths) normally rated for 230 V, the rated residual
2 S1 }  L' {2 pmaking and breaking capacity has to be tested at 230 V.
0 l0 Z5 n2 R. \( q# Q; N4 F; P) n- ^* xFor a two pole switch normally rated for 400 V, the rated residual making and breaking
capacity has to be tested at 400 V.
For a three pole switch normally rated for 400 V, the rated residual making and breaking
% p; p& Y4 u/ h8 p9 acapacity has to be tested at 400 V.
; f+ a$ {- a  z5 O; iFor a three pole switch with four current paths and for a four pole switch normally rated for
5 }) D5 |+ [( W  }) D400 V, the rated residual making and breaking capacity has to be tested at 230 V.
. C$ A. k) q, ~3 G1 k/ M+ p+ fDue to the fact that the purpose of this test is not to cover the special fault conditions in IT-systems,
. ~& \/ E% E. Q$ I6 S2 ythe test voltage for this verification of the rated residual making and breaking capacity should be
( h$ p% Z7 }4 w4 b& Z$ ?230 V, independent of the number of poles, and the relevant figures should be corrected.
Decision taken at the SC23E WG2 meeting in Nice, October 2001:
" T$ s# {0 p# {8 TExtract from the minutes IEC SC23E_WG2_006:
SC23E_WG2_010 request from Austria to update 61008 clause 9.11.2.3
The proposal made by Mr Bachl was considered justified and accepted. During the meeting
WG2 decided that laboratories and certification bodies should be informed about this
' c! s. K3 m5 W4 Q: a$ Jimportant decision.
8 K2 x1 K2 l4 jTherefore the following statement was drafted:
2
Decision to be forwarded to CTL:
IEC SC23E WG2 decided to correct the inconsistent test requirement in IEC 61008-1 (1996-12), subclause
* T( R: _' v7 j9.11.2.3 and in IEC 61009-1 (1996-12), subclause 9.12.13 - Verification of the rated residual
: e- o+ f' [; D0 t1 O9 Fmaking and breaking capacity IDm.
" n$ I: d1 D. O/ qThe test voltage for this verification of the rated residual making and breaking capacity should be the
line to neutral voltage, independent of the number of poles of the RCCB or RCBO. This correction will
+ j- o- v, F9 c& hbe included in the next amendment or revision of IEC 61008-1 and IEC 61009-1.
The revised test circuit (fig. 7) proposed for the standard is attached.
: N" x5 M, p0 d- c4 p0 W5 m

! |8 o* V2 k" |; l% Y, s. O, L# z