|
| DSH 5884 A$ [ E) V$ u. g) r: \
, `/ C, \) ?! y) ^ | Verification of main contact position, position of the handle# q; q* R6 h7 y: t# I
| 8.2.5.3.2 of IEC60947-1 and 8.3.3.9 of IEC60947-2
2 ~7 B1 L+ v! y$ J; T6 \$ q' b7 V | 60947-1(ed.1);am1 & 60947-1(ed.2) & 60947-1(ed.2);am1;am2 & 60947-1(ed.3) & 60947-1(ed.3);am1;am2 & 60947-1(ed.3);am2 & 60947-1(ed.4) & 60947-1(ed.5) & 60947-1(ed.5);am1 & 60947-2(ed.1);am1 & 60947-2(ed.2) & 60947-2(ed.2);am1;am2 & 60947-2(ed.3); k+ k- U" m; }, m5 |! }
|
4 ^ L5 P& _- E0 M" \Standard(s): IEC60947-1, IEC60947-) f; c4 ?9 S1 s/ V' `9 o: d
2, IEC60947-35 E" u0 T, f0 I ^+ l) k2 @& B
Sub clause(s):
1 |- V# K5 F# Z8.2.5.3.2 of IEC60947-1 and
% N. I% D1 f D+ E" b! a, D8.3.3.9 of IEC60947-2! B1 }6 X% J+ ~% @* d
Sheet No.
+ V4 {) ~0 K6 p+ VDSH 588
/ X* P# A& H d# P" J# rSubject:
( K' G: w! V- G7 NVerification of main contact
, `$ T% u9 `( _- U/ b' n+ ~. Tposition, position of the handle( s9 |0 o/ o: W- X
Key words:4 ^' R1 l+ Y3 h- ]1 {2 r2 f( g! d
- suitable for isolation
" e9 L3 `3 z. f- indication of contact# d$ y; h) r$ B6 K% f0 q, e
position
$ s. c1 u. R6 K1 LDecision approved
/ p; h0 R+ i* Bduring the CTL Plenary6 A2 _) n0 h* K7 K9 w/ i$ U0 x
Meeting 2006
1 A0 `$ F- }. G5 QQuestion:
( O/ o8 U' _# i; cVerification of the main contact position is conducted only on products suitable for isolation. This is an
! a9 }! P# C& `" |" S% Z* J/ Qadditional requirement to be verified. With respect to this test, the following two questions gave rise to
5 l: h5 m# ^! f# ^. e, ~% [! [discussions( t5 J1 `+ N l1 S* i
Q1: When after the 3F test, the indicator comes to rest in a position between the trip and open position (which
' ~5 ]# A" X8 q( Fis not the tripped or open position as indicated on the product), is this a pass when tested according 8.2.5.3 of
, a' X. q7 z" g5 P ]& z' gIEC60947-1?0 m( a* c' T! U$ q$ y+ ]
Q2: If the answer of Q1 is yes, is this in conflict with the general constructional requirements of 7.1.5 or how$ X) _( T9 W6 w0 ~. h' ?) n
should section 7.1.6.1 (additional constructional requirements) be interpreted?
- Y& T- H6 b/ O+ T2 Q1 S- n" ]! PDecision:$ T7 b# c7 ^7 }' v8 q5 U7 I, e7 F% k
There are two possibilities, depending on the features of the MCCB:& S. S/ u5 ` y- D$ w3 g# |
1) The indicator is the actuator, and it is the only position indicator, or! v# i! Z6 [0 u, O
2) There is an actuator that may show the operating position, but in addition there is a" n& f3 _: `, V. ]3 ^
separate position indicator.% Z6 R$ U% ]5 {" c6 E+ U
For construction per item 1, this result is not acceptable
% k/ ?: A1 P( \7 g. \' R3 SFor construction per item 2, the result described is acceptable if the separate position" @3 A" U( j( P7 d" k0 e7 }* r
indicator unambiguously shows the closed position, irrespective of the position of the
. C p, ~2 q; ~# S- cactuator.. N; h8 w6 i \
Refer to IEC 60947-1, Clause 7.1.6.1
' [, {) y4 O% r. E
$ E* n1 F$ \' g b) B- p; F `, s$ @4 Y) y3 @
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册安规
x
|