|
" N! r1 s# m* T: \ |8 b6 b% t- |4 f2 G6 b
| Identification4 p- s' y4 r( i2 ]
| 5.1.2
' I7 R/ _8 s' A | 61010-1(ed.1);am1;am2# L8 F, b8 ` x9 f# C0 _3 r
| " G1 R8 q0 w7 N* s2 O4 ~' X- u
+ D) m& Z6 d* V
Standard:! r8 }' |( k( t8 ^
IEC 61010-1:1990 +A1:1992 + A28 I. W p" q. e2 ?+ E9 B
:1995 L, w" X7 ?, Z4 O
Sub clause:4 [) g0 ^+ p% J8 L# F
5.1.2
# ^! s2 m; a. s% QSheet n. 362
; v( W( p0 s" WPage 1(1)
# I8 ?4 y$ M7 F* n$ @& ~4 a* b' c) mSubject: h1 Z7 F! O5 V0 y8 ~0 k) i. r
Identification, h5 d& Q( t' V) ~; x4 z- Y2 y
Key words:( D" ?! S1 U' f. I* |
- Manufacturer’s name
9 V) X% X' I3 C- Trade mark" j3 T3 e/ A F W% T
- Agent/Supplier' L$ T3 ^6 @! `0 |7 h8 }. \
Decision taken by
% {6 C* {) T5 y! H `* S+ zETF3 and confirmed
: w4 F+ `4 ? G6 E! U# b, ]by CTL at its 38th
0 n1 N$ Q- P# f8 mmeeting, in Toronto
4 Q$ c- I* A7 GQuestion:0 j/ n& {0 u% _; D/ b9 ?" H
Manufacturer's name or registered trade mark. Is manufacturer's agent/supplier name
9 c9 ?( q( M3 D/ e( B( p) Eacceptable as an alternative for identification?$ c/ B- k r) J+ l
Decision:( ?/ q4 ^- F" D# E7 p1 t9 Q* h1 f
In the absence of a definition for “manufacturer” in IEC61010-1, it was decided that only9 u. c9 v( [& `& k# Y. a5 R4 g
manufacturer’s name is acceptable under this sub-clause.
8 { p9 O: l6 b) b) ?
4 n0 ~ ]! ~+ m; Y+ B0 c0 }0 {" T% F2 O3 G1 t m6 u+ c
4 i4 J7 H. L6 {
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|