|
| DSH 753
& q, }* N2 S: Z% B5 f
* P7 g! q7 m) G' l& o$ y | Capacitor discharge voltage measurement+ A0 ^+ m( A4 [
| 9.1.6 (IEC60065/2001) 6.10.3 (IEC61010-1/2001)
. l2 Q$ t2 o* b0 q9 F5 v | 61010-1(ed.2) & 60065(ed.7)) w0 {0 Q/ X l5 N' K8 O8 Z& m
|
# \* b- O5 ]; f* N4 J) jStandard(s): No. Year; E) Q, v9 X8 c( a, I' J2 ~; `4 J
IEC60065/2001
2 V+ l+ i3 ^/ j* F4 pIEC61010-1/2001
$ J t# N6 b' PDSH 0753
7 X0 h/ S5 b9 f4 e f2009
" }( _0 c$ o+ L& E6 OCategory:
7 J; Q( o b& j# m5 O7 P. FTRON, MEAS
( f& _6 @ I( a3 `$ R( N! v: A8 TSubclause(s):+ x" y4 Y& B; u9 S; g( X
9.1.6; K" _4 v) D: v+ j0 J
6.10.3
/ v0 v4 L% T8 K. tDeveloped by:& ?4 ]/ h/ V( y1 Q& U0 Y* @. w
WG4, ETF2, ETF3
- \2 U4 D; Z" S1 P6 {5 o" P& F8 G4 z) [- zSubject:7 E! n: ^" n9 x5 T- Y# e) z
Capacitor discharge4 C% w% |5 y* P7 q2 H
voltage measurement
1 A7 v. w4 C# \Key words:
. @- A1 d0 a0 N2 w- Plug discharge& D. _$ H1 M- k+ H- F/ l
- Capacitor discharge1 R1 {. w+ W/ L2 w
- Shock hazard
0 T) D" J# o4 ?% lApproved at the 47th CTL( ?+ A' T& f9 S0 c$ b4 O9 O
Plenary Meeting, year 2010
- n9 U; i* s) E6 y( \( k. yQuestion:$ v8 }) |" a, E# w& Q
The standards referenced include a test commonly referred to as a plug discharge or capacitor/ ?* R! {! r/ ^
discharge test that involves disconnecting the product under test from the mains and
2 y0 ^7 f! \% H+ ^4 Jmeasuring the residual voltage across a capacitor(s) at a specified time. The intent in each of
+ u$ @. ~- X4 Z2 V8 Kthe referenced standards is the same – measure the maximum voltage obtainable at the time
! F7 x) A2 `2 E3 l9 c: j/ i7 Vspecified.' \2 x p+ t* {/ `
(1) Each standard has a slightly different description of how the mains disconnect is made, but! J t1 ^2 {5 A
the intent is to disconnect at the highest voltage possible in the AC power cycle. With the7 `8 n$ T# Q6 w, ^& u& k6 d" y1 b3 y! P
advent of electronic voltage sensing switches, it is possible to disconnect at the peak voltage in! F0 E( `; y3 [( k
the AC cycle. Using this procedure seems to be within the intent of the standards and would! q5 K+ y7 K. Y; _
result in more consistent and repeatable results. Is it acceptable to perform the test this way?
; Z* _- J" O0 W(2) Good laboratory practice dictates that the voltage should be measured with a high input
" i- [$ {9 l a* vimpedance voltmeter. For this test, some standards require the use of a voltmeter with an input
0 u. v" s5 R0 Lresistance of 100 M 1 ± 5 M 1 in parallel with an input capacitance of 25 pF or less. For more7 a$ |2 q/ i- r% J: r- L
consistent and repeatable results should this type of meter always be used for this type of test?& `3 P3 @1 o+ S9 H5 l) G
Decision:" J! p. u2 u) k% z* I6 G; l
(1) Yes, this method should always be used for these tests within the CB Scheme.2 H Y( K* j' O) t5 J1 }
(2) Yes, a meter with the stated input impedance should always be used for these tests within
4 |; b" h x; @# m! S5 e, kthe CB Scheme.
# K: C+ i: F8 C* v" b& p/ S
+ {/ I, Y! A" J, D* R
( P" j4 z5 E* q; `* L1 [$ H |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册安规
x
|