|
| DSH 436/ d6 e, s4 z0 v$ D
+ B+ A4 q9 n' o; t
| Verification of the rated residual making and breaking capacity IDm
* B/ n/ @& L) i1 [$ _ | 9.11.2.3
8 l- @) b0 c* l" s% R; q | 61008-1(ed.2)( o0 q I" y0 v. [
|
" R1 ], v: A7 xStandard:; D: d D3 t2 O- i
IEC 61008-1 (1996-12)
# E9 ]1 L# o G2 y0 JSub clause:3 P3 D# ]6 h0 x" b
9.11.2.3
- @ z% [2 u3 U( T! O3 D8 `( kSheet No. 436
* P2 U6 w2 v% o8 aSubject:
b4 w; S% ^# u, W+ KVerification of the rated residual
& r5 N) A7 h( ?" [making and breaking capacity IDm
+ t4 b+ r6 T- V6 lKey words: Confirmed at 39th
8 Q+ }6 R, ]* |+ H# KCTL Meeting1 m- M6 Z3 {. a" C
Question:
2 ~ a- J( ^8 u- I. W7 s1 J! d8 E9.11.2.3 refers to the test conditions prescribed in 9.11.2.1 and states that the resistor R3 shall
/ k( ?7 u3 ]" @4 S* }# |not be used.
. s- t, F+ }5 s$ r. Y9 F9.11.2.1 require the test circuits according to figures 5 to 9 together with resistor R2 to be used.
, T2 K! x: n" F2 N7 UAccording to these figures, the following inconsistency appears:
( Y# a) ]+ f8 N SFor a single pole switch (with two current paths) normally rated for 230 V, the rated residual
2 _* d& V0 T3 Y2 `making and breaking capacity has to be tested at 230 V.
+ Q7 l+ P4 ]0 {0 qFor a two pole switch normally rated for 400 V, the rated residual making and breaking
! j; f7 }5 |1 t; z3 c! g0 @capacity has to be tested at 400 V.
& c8 x& Z4 W8 s; n EFor a three pole switch normally rated for 400 V, the rated residual making and breaking, w% K m3 H" R1 @9 J- v
capacity has to be tested at 400 V.% c: A3 w5 _4 x0 i) b: w
For a three pole switch with four current paths and for a four pole switch normally rated for
% ?6 ?5 G# E% V$ w/ T400 V, the rated residual making and breaking capacity has to be tested at 230 V.
& y2 T2 P7 o/ J. eDue to the fact that the purpose of this test is not to cover the special fault conditions in IT-systems,
6 C4 d( q/ H F2 q Cthe test voltage for this verification of the rated residual making and breaking capacity should be
5 e6 o+ X( D" A9 o7 g g) U230 V, independent of the number of poles, and the relevant figures should be corrected.
6 E" O, x8 l9 P9 K+ {Decision taken at the SC23E WG2 meeting in Nice, October 2001:
. ]4 Z/ K+ l9 K# S( xExtract from the minutes IEC SC23E_WG2_006:
+ i/ z3 T$ I+ `& w/ i$ l$ GSC23E_WG2_010 request from Austria to update 61008 clause 9.11.2.3
! @4 q# p9 b6 e& g& b4 OThe proposal made by Mr Bachl was considered justified and accepted. During the meeting
# o5 d& T! S1 tWG2 decided that laboratories and certification bodies should be informed about this0 F& k. \ |2 \6 G+ r2 K
important decision.
& g0 @7 E3 t5 I9 U& e1 x" NTherefore the following statement was drafted:" u. ~) y, w# L7 H) R* m
2( U% N2 h1 s6 Q4 I0 s" y
Decision to be forwarded to CTL:# K& n8 e8 S3 p+ W
IEC SC23E WG2 decided to correct the inconsistent test requirement in IEC 61008-1 (1996-12), subclause
1 g8 L( q9 o. C: s, V" l& b7 v9.11.2.3 and in IEC 61009-1 (1996-12), subclause 9.12.13 - Verification of the rated residual
( w5 H7 m4 w0 n) U; gmaking and breaking capacity IDm.
( p7 W- c( B+ g& a$ mThe test voltage for this verification of the rated residual making and breaking capacity should be the4 W9 h U& K" d5 I* ]5 ^# ?* q% q
line to neutral voltage, independent of the number of poles of the RCCB or RCBO. This correction will
2 q C6 u# N) Q" r& n0 bbe included in the next amendment or revision of IEC 61008-1 and IEC 61009-1.: o2 a' W6 L$ v/ ^) n' _) l/ P
The revised test circuit (fig. 7) proposed for the standard is attached.1 |- v5 T4 m, p% }
; k( x2 |7 H4 Z& ]- W9 n+ ~9 `
0 d7 l0 x p. N |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册安规
x
|