|
| DSH 588' h2 z4 H5 Z A/ [( q$ {/ v/ q0 t
9 M& m/ e% n# q9 M/ l7 h6 B9 v
| Verification of main contact position, position of the handle
; Q! C/ |* v' `2 y | 8.2.5.3.2 of IEC60947-1 and 8.3.3.9 of IEC60947-2( r( S( }/ H; o+ |" X6 h
| 60947-1(ed.1);am1 & 60947-1(ed.2) & 60947-1(ed.2);am1;am2 & 60947-1(ed.3) & 60947-1(ed.3);am1;am2 & 60947-1(ed.3);am2 & 60947-1(ed.4) & 60947-1(ed.5) & 60947-1(ed.5);am1 & 60947-2(ed.1);am1 & 60947-2(ed.2) & 60947-2(ed.2);am1;am2 & 60947-2(ed.3)1 m* p- i" D$ B ?' }
|
% N p' I2 J! S, ~1 ]Standard(s): IEC60947-1, IEC60947-
7 Y( h& x2 f$ i' q" n2, IEC60947-3: P! [2 n5 f+ a2 {6 f3 l2 E
Sub clause(s):3 q# J1 D- ^1 Y# c( Y! }1 i, ] k
8.2.5.3.2 of IEC60947-1 and# [6 ^" s$ c. Y5 {/ Z. V+ r
8.3.3.9 of IEC60947-2
9 v3 |2 L/ U! t* _! @' ?8 {; sSheet No.4 u! Q2 s8 o, N1 P/ {) `3 u0 e
DSH 5884 w( j4 x* i( ?) T" D
Subject:
* d- T' B/ i% d) pVerification of main contact
+ V6 h7 @7 B& O' @$ y! N8 Tposition, position of the handle/ M( i, S3 x1 S
Key words:) }: h7 z9 ]# {
- suitable for isolation
9 J! f8 r2 B7 S- indication of contact
4 n! ~% E9 Z" D8 X4 f: \. C+ pposition
3 R: ?) `# r1 K5 F% H; ~Decision approved
, x$ x1 [5 y5 T; K3 Uduring the CTL Plenary3 [' q$ {0 B$ z7 p3 U' \# t
Meeting 20063 f0 W5 u9 G- r4 Z& e
Question:( p ~* r4 X T( Z
Verification of the main contact position is conducted only on products suitable for isolation. This is an/ d1 G h* ?2 _
additional requirement to be verified. With respect to this test, the following two questions gave rise to
; w. ^) b& @9 cdiscussions5 w/ m3 Z" \$ g: R2 ~0 P1 Y9 z
Q1: When after the 3F test, the indicator comes to rest in a position between the trip and open position (which
, s; i4 X7 R* E% t' b; V7 Cis not the tripped or open position as indicated on the product), is this a pass when tested according 8.2.5.3 of. W6 ?, { v% @2 B3 V9 w' d) J; b- z
IEC60947-1?
- W; l9 w2 ^3 f7 o% E% e' H7 Z+ l; N! GQ2: If the answer of Q1 is yes, is this in conflict with the general constructional requirements of 7.1.5 or how9 Q" V! H" T; E; z; B+ q* A
should section 7.1.6.1 (additional constructional requirements) be interpreted?: s) G* _8 N. _1 W7 E' r
Decision:
: Y/ n. n/ H0 P% d6 j) XThere are two possibilities, depending on the features of the MCCB:( c; A7 v+ C3 S* q4 K9 N
1) The indicator is the actuator, and it is the only position indicator, or
0 A# r, _) q \2 l7 p( s6 t2) There is an actuator that may show the operating position, but in addition there is a/ [& U; e1 a& \$ b |
separate position indicator.! h# v. |% u6 h& n, }+ ^
For construction per item 1, this result is not acceptable: d* j2 H+ u) L5 E* m9 Z. E4 g
For construction per item 2, the result described is acceptable if the separate position
M4 O' k. R' P. z$ \indicator unambiguously shows the closed position, irrespective of the position of the
2 _2 ?7 Z# @& vactuator.
5 x0 j1 q/ H0 c( B8 P/ v) iRefer to IEC 60947-1, Clause 7.1.6.1
( r* c4 R; d# F
2 _1 X/ p' ~! c; @$ p K( p. S( q; W- l% f" c D9 a" v* Y
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|