|
|
! j( |. s5 [; u
* R) B8 L: V; x& i- x$ ` | Comparative tracking Index
# Q6 {8 r$ l* n5 v | Tables in Annex D6 E5 Y8 l k" |) {3 ]' b
| 61010-1(ed.1);am1;am2
2 L# |- s4 x5 A2 b. P& t0 q |
S4 G: T5 Z1 Q
0 o$ p6 {! r) O% m5 U3 F
Standard:: v9 G+ z9 {9 R d# b) ~
IEC 61010-1:1990 +A1:1992 + A22 S5 h) X g+ ~( W
:1995
* N. J4 M8 C3 RSub clause:
; D1 w5 }% N3 S4 ATables in Annex D) y/ } b3 n0 j+ c; C% |0 y
Sheet n. 369, Z& C" ~, v* f4 U0 M- A
Page 1(1)4 o1 Q4 |) i7 W0 I3 p; n4 t2 e
Subject:5 \* \2 L+ r, H0 P* X! l
Comparative Tracking Index7 V2 u# `+ z/ k/ s7 {* I
Key words:* Y) [" T6 i- g2 G2 d6 f( v- z
- CTI values
' B8 `* A" k5 { t& u* x- Manufacturer’s claim
2 Z) H: g: u/ T* {+ ^5 c1 z/ WDecision taken by& P7 @# s) y$ e" W0 i$ F
ETF3 and confirmed
3 N, N6 l) y0 X5 C: ?- \' ? [by CTL at its 38th
2 x% p2 Z* A% o8 Smeeting, in Toronto0 K& {. I7 v+ W7 T' q4 t$ L
Questions :: \7 l1 u) O' f; c+ [
1. Is the manufacturer's declaration regarding the CTI values acceptable by Test Houses?
+ ~& h1 I8 p4 L) i+ R; i. H2.Is a single test for the CTI value acceptable?
* l; h& c$ l/ a3 M" Y3.Which CTI value is to be used when no value tested or declared, for example for PCB's?7 m6 |5 v. j. [# c. U; b J0 ?; G
Decision:
7 g# P( F+ r2 k1. The manufacturer’s claim is not adequate and must be backed by an independent test
+ {3 t V0 s% l) n3 ~- ?/ s$ D! Dreport/certificate from a recognised test house.
* ^+ Y9 \7 |5 X: ~2. No testing considered necessary if the material is approved and fit for purpose. However
! G5 i# o Z& S4 o3 nif not approved than single test is not acceptable." E, P4 e: O; w! F& J0 c) q8 ]+ x& W
3. The least favourable value, for example CTI value of < 100.1 T9 V; V; K% u% n o3 A6 s
2 d% P: V- t" z" g# f0 |4 [: U. q
( r- G4 t4 z" g: l' c7 k7 m
" s$ \0 {. A) A: g |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看，没有账号？注册安规
x
|
/1 
|关于安规|小黑屋|安规QQ群|Archiver|手机版|安规网
( 粤ICP13023453-10 ) 
窥视卡
雷达卡
发表于 2012-9-18 11:53
提升卡
置顶卡
沉默卡
喧嚣卡
变色卡
抢沙发
千斤顶
显身卡