安规网

 找回密码
 注册安规
安规论坛 | 仪器设备 | 求职招聘 | 国家标准 公告 | 教程 | 家电 | 灯具 | 环保 | ITAV 签到 充值 在线 打卡 设备 好友| 帖子| 空间| 日志| 相册
IP淋雨机 | 证书查询 | 规范下载 | 资质查询 招聘 | 考试 | 线缆 | 玩具 | 标准 | 综 合 红包 邮箱 打卡 工资 禁言 分享| 记录| 道具| 勋章| 任务
水平垂直燃烧机 | 针焰 | 灼热丝 | 漏电起痕
IP防水防尘设备|拉力机|恒温恒湿|标准试验指
灯头量规|插头量规|静风烤箱|电池设备|球压
万年历 | 距元旦节还有
自2007年5月10日,安规网已运行
IP淋雨设备| 恒温恒湿箱| 拉力机| 医疗检测设备沙特Saber 埃及COI 中东GCC|CoC直接发证机构水平垂直燃烧机|灼热丝|针焰试验机|漏电起痕试验机
灯头量规|试验指|插头插座量规|灯具检测设备耐划痕试验机|可程式恒温恒湿试验箱 | 耦合器设备广东安规-原厂生产-满足标准-审核无忧
查看: 472|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[HOUS] DSH 710 Creepage/clearance

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-9-8 13:21 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
广东安规检测
有限公司提供:
DSH 7108 I. h. ?7 ?; R; a& a
- q. @+ h( b. d8 }, _
Creepage/clearance' X' M" z7 X, g+ [' B) m5 o0 I
29.22 j* a; d/ B# m9 u0 H+ B0 O
60335-1(ed.4)
- R* u* Z7 z# J5 V+ Q6 _

1 |" O1 r3 {" s# N7 g; }4 |Question:! Z8 e6 w$ e- L8 F; K5 T) u6 p
We have found situations in which a printed circuit board (PCB) with a declared CTI of 400 or higher, passes the test on the component side of the PCB, that is not lacquered, but does not pass the test on the printed circuit side with SMD components that is lacquered or varnished, and is typically in green colour.
2 J( s" A9 u" x3 @7 J1 - Do both sides need to comply with the required CTI, if the corresponding creepage distance so requires it?
7 j% k4 q' @, |% N+ t  ]2 - On the other hand, it could be said that the varnish over the printed circuit side of the PCB allows us to consider that the creepage distance is not applicable. Therefore, the CTI would not be necessary. In our opinion, this consideration is not correct. Do you agree?! I% Z5 W# ~  U" g2 x6 D
3 - In any case, if the manufacturer wants to reduce the distances below the limits for the relevant CTI and pollution degree, the manufacturer could improve the pollution degree category by using a coating that is annex J compliant and apply the corresponding column for pollution degree 1 in tables 17 or 18. Do you agree?, D- y. m5 Y* y, o7 {- K( n
4 - Even in the case of a CTI certified raw material PCB, the varnished side of the final mounted PCB should be tested to the relevant CTI unless a valid CTI certificate is provided. Do you agree?% w0 p  k4 \) P: ^
Decision:% f9 X6 m4 q+ _9 [( a; _. `
1- If the varnish covers completely the PCB over the soldered components, no CTI is required for the varnish. CTI is required for the PCB under the varnish, and the corresponding distances must be required according to the varnish type 1 or 2., w. W" W6 s- g# Y2 q
2- If there are relevant parts not varnished, for instance soldering points, the varnish has to comply with the corresponding CTI for the creepage distance in addition to the requirements under the varnish for the PCB.% Y$ ~! X4 F4 D8 k; \: G
- S( R% M' h5 D1 r  b( e& g

, ^3 n4 h/ C: a  O' w9 i4 O
$ o5 W/ k  |* A* S
, k- A7 h  Q1 C1 w! }$ a, q' f

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册安规

x
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册安规

本版积分规则

关闭

安规网为您推荐上一条 /2 下一条

QQ|关于安规|小黑屋|安规QQ群|Archiver|手机版|安规网 ( 粤ICP13023453-10 )

GMT+8, 2024-11-23 01:57 , Processed in 0.057845 second(s), 25 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.|广东安规赞助

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表