|
% A7 w4 ?4 Z7 S7 g1 r. gStandard(s):" c2 r+ n( `2 l5 N: a
IEC 60065:1998, 6th ed.
# T$ p1 Y# } T0 m2 wSub clause(s):+ b: L* Q' E9 I6 @2 E
8.8& p Y' ?! t) ^9 u" v5 ~! c! N" F
Sheet No:
Q! U8 e3 {$ w" E" u/ }- @8 L5 `" \393
4 H; ?/ U0 O, G" y" C% DSubject:) w" h! y& f8 C; b; q/ A) r, g
Test of non-separable thin
* m; t' u' u ?0 P. ?sheet material a5 d' R" l" b+ v# z6 y
Key words:' @) {; v" Z( J( t
- Thin sheet material
+ c* H- O" N: b- l: s/ BDecision taken at the 39th
f Y0 m, t' r" q7 n% `6 \0 rmeeting 2002
' p+ m5 V, \5 `Question:
; I% ]$ N/ K+ T: i! [1 o3 z- {Current technology is utilising non-separable thin sheet insulation within transformers for supplementary and6 k( T; E: a/ a0 C' U1 v. K
/or reinforced insulation. How should such non-separable insulation be assessed for suitability in these) H2 D$ d& d" @' c/ ^: G
applications?
2 _/ h" b3 E3 k0 L- _; H* lRationale:. R, A0 a" G$ `2 P9 D) h0 r/ Z/ H: k
There are non-separable thin sheet foils on the market used in wound components, which cannot be tested
$ O6 H; s# r, y) O% raccording to the requirements and test-method in the existing standard. The current published
; k' a# ]1 h3 q f" P: t% R: drequirements in the standard do not adequately address the use on non-separable thin sheet insulation A
! M# a' A2 L- L5 v# jproposal was made by TC92-WG1 on how this matter can be handled.: u) Y7 s9 T+ s1 [( T
Decision:
6 t1 G& i! u) T4 |. r: p6 N6 @5 T. EThe following proposal shall be used until the new edition is published.
7 P; }) X9 V8 [' Z I- RThe following amendment to the standard will be published to address this issue:
7 C3 ], {3 G/ o( ?- V5 \add to clause 8.8 For requirements for non-separable thin sheet insulation in two or more layers, see 8.xx
; Z- d/ ~4 X% p* X* z7 W8 tadd new clause 8.xx7 h6 j0 y1 I! H; g4 t
8.xx Requirements for non-separable thin sheet insulation in two or more layers1 K3 z A5 ~2 h
Three separate test specimens of the sheet of 70 mm width shall be supplied by the manufacturer. The test! q: Z& g. T- @, H. ^: U9 x5 P
is carried out by fixing a specimen on a mandrel made of steel, nickel plated, or brass with smooth surface
& u E w Q% }3 \ g: T- yfinish as shown in figure x. A metal foil (aluminium or copper) 0,035 mm ± 0,005 mm thick shall be placed8 n) ]% W# I G J
close to the surface of the specimen and submitted to a pull of 1 N. The metal foil shall be so positioned that" d: a! i9 k& f7 s+ l
its edges are 20 mm away from the edge of the specimen and, when the mandrel is in its final position, it
. y8 @. J$ @% G4 k9 ]: r: kcovers the edges upon which the specimen is lying by at least 10 mm. The specimen is submitted to a pull
* r$ D) ]( ~% }% x/ Mof 150 N at its free end by an appropriate clamping device. The specimen shall be slowly rotated forwards6 G$ t# b9 N- S9 E+ T% E
and backwards three times by 230° without jerks. If the specimen breaks at the clamping device during the, q( J8 x1 d+ M1 h
rotation, the test is repeated. If one or more specimens break at any other place, the test is not fulfilled./ r4 @9 e% W6 d# `9 G' `1 d2 ~
While the mandrel is in its final position, within the minute following the final positioning, a test voltage of 1,5
. `: G4 U" N9 x; f1 d3 S* u& X7 htimes the value specified in table 5 is applied, as described in 10.3.2, between the mandrel and the metal
! P% @ _% f# L, m" S% nfoil. No flashover or breakdown shall occur during the test, corona effects and similar phenomena being2 e+ T, d2 q* R$ x
disregarded.
' d! G( z+ A( a3 j6 s* kadd new Figure x (Figure 6 of IEC 61558-1)/ Z7 O- \( _2 V; X+ T- |1 I" y
% i1 s# `+ M0 D3 D( E& E- k6 P( C! r$ T& U2 C
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册安规
x
|