|
| DSH 437: W2 s$ i$ r3 s, g7 D1 H
: X# A6 R# \ g' G& I
| Verification of the rated residual making and breaking capacity ID m
0 j- G* F. f# J3 i9 ~' o2 X; v- G | 9.12.13 ]. @0 f7 |1 b* C
| 61009-1(ed.2)
, e. f6 I4 ]5 b# ~7 t3 U5 c! ` |
: T& U2 u& p+ N4 N+ yStandard:
6 D! U* \' I. r7 Q. e/ BIEC 61009-1 (1996-12), N5 N6 x: Y$ `2 _9 x
Sub clause:1 U; `* E2 x; F
9.12.13
, S. J `. d( ~. _Sheet No. 4377 R2 F( p; z$ U% U! b. F4 W' Y
Subject& o( t7 }1 q" h: N5 b+ b7 t
Verification of the rated residual
' p' b) f2 k, @0 dmaking and breaking capacity IDm* a- P4 @0 E6 C1 t
Key words: Confirmed at CTL
+ g- l. R) P- [3 M. L* Y/ U, f39th Meeting
8 O9 x/ R5 L3 m: s VQuestion:
) `5 ^( a) Z) T9 ]3 x! P" q9.12.13.1 refers to the test conditions prescribed in 9.12.1 and states that the impedance Z1 shall& ?. K9 K B6 C% }9 Z' s
not be used.( A3 R* o O8 R8 [5 u. z
9.12.1 refers to the conditions in 9.12.1 to 9.12.12.
4 F% Y0 {- I; r% `& u; u" E9.12.2 and 9.12.7.4 require the test circuits according to figures 5 to 9 together with impedance# H9 y j8 f P6 B+ T7 _
Z2 to be used.
/ P1 B- G8 X- e2 ~ b" H% E$ fAccording to these figures the following inconsistency appears:
/ V- ^7 [2 \) @1 S) o% [For a single pole switch (with two current paths) normally rated for 230 V, the rated residual9 Q9 Z9 f9 @; l6 m& f
making and breaking capacity has to be tested at 230 V.
% G1 z$ ?- ^3 \, {/ c. wFor a two pole switch normally rated for 400 V, the rated residual making and breaking
. K, [, u* ?7 \% }& F1 H4 q8 Ncapacity has to be tested at 400 V.
- U; j4 S$ X$ L2 k, w4 \2 g9 gFor a three pole switch normally rated for 400 V, the rated residual making and breaking7 {) a* A. l5 |9 Q( v
capacity has to be tested at 400 V.
- ~( t1 Q7 I b; W8 c( ?For a three pole switch with four current paths and for a four pole switch normally rated for
& C7 F* H7 B8 |9 e' A400 V, the rated residual making and breaking capacity has to be tested at 230 V.
& @& C6 u0 x4 ^# ?, e8 dDue to the fact that the purpose of this test is not to cover the special fault conditions in IT-systems,6 n9 p2 }7 @- w' l' a
the test voltage for this verification of the rated residual making and breaking capacity should be/ i0 P5 u6 b3 H( \( G# b0 B9 R) ^
230 V, independent of the number of poles, and the relevant figures should be corrected. V0 G" Z; u- c
Decision taken at the SC23E WG2 meeting in Nice, October 2001:* h. G d q- Y: e
Extract from the minutes IEC SC23E_WG2_006:1 R7 b6 D( @) Q2 O1 Z: I, p0 `
SC23E_WG2_010 request from Austria to update 61008 clause 9.11.2.3; ~. B! J# V; Q( N% R
The proposal made by Mr Bachl was considered justified and accepted. During the meeting; j; o8 U: [, w! R$ V$ f
WG2 decided that laboratories and certification bodies should be informed about this: M1 ~$ U s: o. \! v
important decision.
, u" A6 m8 y8 C0 u' ATherefore the following statement was drafted:+ o7 r) x- u1 K0 V2 T; m# F
2
$ l8 r- c4 X; ~+ b& X) R) |- lDecision to be forwarded to CTL:8 ~9 q# M; q; |# ]( {
IEC SC23E WG2 decided to correct the inconsistent test requirement in IEC 61008-1 (1996-12), subclause( Z4 D; g7 d$ E2 d9 V) v: ?* V- w
9.11.2.3 and in IEC 61009-1 (1996-12), subclause 9.12.13 - Verification of the rated residual+ H: G6 E! R2 u' p$ V* v
making and breaking capacity IDm.
& M) N1 h& v# m l: XThe test voltage for this verification of the rated residual making and breaking capacity should be the0 j- `% Q Y4 P) O7 S. Q5 P" U6 `
line to neutral voltage, independent of the number of poles of the RCCB or RCBO. This correction will
% X- K+ |, j. d0 M( R, Xbe included in the next amendment or revision of IEC 61008-1 and IEC 61009-1.
0 B2 q3 V+ z4 L' l/ @ k0 J7 BThe revised test circuit (fig. 7) proposed for the standard is attached.) }* N% ~2 d8 V; f0 o. n
6 A c; T" p9 H6 G, j
1 I' y8 D% `( B3 n& @9 D
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册安规
x
|