|
| DSH 5977 [; Z% t" f% I7 y
+ D- K8 b6 v& S$ B' j! N/ ] | Verificaton of main contact position, position of the actuator+ K! M1 Z4 b) i/ W, h; R
| 8.3.3.9# @' k% x' @, A
| 60947-1(ed.1);am1 & 60947-1(ed.2) & 60947-1(ed.2);am1;am2 & 60947-1(ed.3) & 60947-1(ed.3);am1;am2 & 60947-1(ed.3);am2 & 60947-1(ed.4) & 60947-1(ed.5) & 60947-1(ed.5);am1 & 60947-2(ed.1);am1 & 60947-2(ed.2) & 60947-2(ed.2);am1;am2 & 60947-2(ed.3) & 60947-2(ed.4) & 60947-2(ed.4);am1
2 d! Q% t$ z Z | " G- V3 V. S$ ~7 r% K/ f
Standard(s): IEC60947-1, IEC60947-
2 L- J8 B, e* V+ G* W2 @: f) X; k2
9 a- f$ H4 `( ?, A: k% }, m9 h: }2 P* uSub clause(s):
/ B0 Y Z8 x& Y5 B- ?8.2.5.3 of IEC60947-1 and
& @5 [6 b9 `5 j8.3.3.9 of IEC60947-25 |! L) I6 o9 J6 j. Y) M
DSH8 z( v4 C/ _- {' \% f4 O+ G. q2 M6 |
5972 g6 o* S; j' T& E( P7 E3 D( L
Subject:: j7 S/ K; H. S @
Verification of main contact8 s% W8 g8 ]$ f; x8 l* E# ?
position, position of the actuator- C N! i5 s/ r1 M. O9 A1 v
Key words:, b* y) \. H l0 M- z) y
- suitable for isolation
( h ~! i' s9 V# z8 Z- indication of contact |; L2 C6 W) R+ e$ J7 k6 Q0 h% E Z
position0 ?5 Q- d0 R" G% r) `
Decision approved by8 f0 w) y3 b( b9 u
the 44th CTL Plenary
& M! C1 a- \( M R# E1 Lmeeting 2007& M; I) Q; Q5 Z7 E# V
Question:! b8 b) c9 @! [ V+ E+ m6 K
Verification of the main contact position is conducted only on products suitable for isolation. This is an9 I/ [1 b0 y& M* u* {. {4 D" N+ @
additional requirement to be verified.6 a. R M- O& Q- U. @
Q1: After the 3F test, the actuator comes to rest in a position between the trip and open position (which is
0 L! Y7 O. V! _4 \neither consistent with the tripped nor with the open position markings as indicated on the product). Is this a
4 X: I. g$ W( e$ b2 J9 v" _pass when tested according 8.2.5.3 of IEC60947-1?
8 F* K8 M3 C# sQ2: If the answer of Q1 is yes, is this in conflict with the general constructional requirements of 7.1.5? How
% g5 y8 P1 F% h5 dshould section 7.1.6.1 (additional (constructional) requirements) be interpreted?5 z* ?9 v4 N9 F
Proposal:1 b( V( ^' ?' Y0 ` E' _
There are two possibilities, depending on the features of the breaker:
. s: n% p# g7 ^& ]+ F( A3 y1) The indicator is the actuator, and it is the only position indicator, or; [$ H4 Q* c+ o' L1 J, N
2) There is an actuator that may show the operating position, but in addition there is a0 b3 w2 g) J P3 I4 M2 ]( w
separate position indicator.( e X3 c6 b' @7 k: Y# M$ T
For construction per item 1, this result is not acceptable4 a# u* g. o. f
For construction per item 2, the result described is acceptable if the separate position
7 _4 ^) P& a8 z& {$ m0 m# Uindicator unambiguously shows the closed position, irrespective of the rest position of the6 H$ d' [5 G+ e- C; k
actuator.% j; \1 d2 k0 w4 Y9 B* c5 J
Refer to IEC 60947-1, Clause 7.1.6.16 f0 S+ z1 l0 N* y) e k
. Z3 |+ j7 Q' _; s$ |+ X3 V ?" C
. U: V+ q! ?- y2 e& |5 G! Z1 t; M
B e* ~4 ]$ P# K5 g7 n |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册安规
x
|