1 w9 _7 l; Z2 |+ \) o" I2.还有就是TABLE 2H 的note C中说如果满足以下条件,则这些例子适用,不知这些例子指的是什么?作者: 安规007 时间: 2011-2-24 10:55
个人认为没有别的含义,类似分B1,B2,B3只是为了能把table 2H和Figure 2相互对应起来而已,至于Note C中例子所指的就是满足以下条件的电路: ! b) q( e5 }' @, |– there is only BASIC INSULATION between the SECONDARY CIRCUIT and the PRIMARY CIRCUIT; and: n/ F4 @1 ~0 W. ~& e6 G
– there is only BASIC INSULATION between the SECONDARY CIRCUIT and earth.作者: jjl314 时间: 2011-2-24 13:14
谢谢二楼的解答 $ }& A% R6 X7 q- ?+ H3 Z/ c3 I' b! S8 k& z/ U' } z) X
对于第一个问题我和二楼的意见一样) J. d' s3 Q" i
, _) c _# S7 C6 q
但对第二个问题我认为你的答案是例子需要满足的要求而不是例子本身。 8 ~& w; [* c2 e+ o& `) E+ O' o @' n% W: }+ ~! z
原文:7 c* c. C$ ~+ w
C 9 B4 X/ N1 X. k: |! e; u: Q+ @9 { Insulation between an unearthed SECONDARY CIRCUIT at HAZARDOUS VOLTAGE and an unearthed accessible condu安规网黑名单ve part or circuit (S/R, S/R1 or S/R2 in Figure 2H) shall satisfy the more onerous of the following:: J( Y! v" M; p' Z# s9 i
– REINFORCED INSULATION whose WORKING VOLTAGE is equal to the HAZARDOUS VOLTAGE; or # h: f+ W" \; i" M) q5 v– SUPPLEMENTARY INSULATION whose WORKING VOLTAGE is equal to the voltage between the SECONDARY CIRCUIT at HAZARDOUS VOLTAGE and + T( q7 e7 m5 H/ G" }" O+ x• another SECONDARY CIRCUIT at HAZARDOUS VOLTAGE, or - C2 y' a5 z) q• a PRIMARY CIRCUIT.: g* J, |0 S* B7 \: n) c
These examples apply if: & d( a0 x, f& ?– there is only BASIC INSULATION between the SECONDARY CIRCUIT and the PRIMARY CIRCUIT; and : @ D+ k; v1 n5 Y– there is only BASIC INSULATION between the SECONDARY CIRCUIT and earth.: y6 D) _( L7 c7 F' G5 v4 @% K9 @
# Q3 h3 N- r. }原文说 these examples apply if:! g- u5 ?7 S# q0 D% f+ {
所以我认为下面的是条件而不是其所说的例子,但是看整个注释C也没找到它说的例子到底是什么。作者: 安规007 时间: 2011-2-24 13:30
These examples apply if: % s3 n" b5 M! P. y2 m1 M. y– there is only BASIC INSULATION between the SECONDARY CIRCUIT and the PRIMARY CIRCUIT; and 6 G) Y% r4 Z$ F. U1 Z1 X– there is only BASIC INSULATION between the SECONDARY CIRCUIT and earth. , V: Z m: a; C& s0 F N5 v+ p. R" }% B- H) G& F! c楼主你误解我的意思了,我没有说是例子本身,我说的是例子的条件,只有满足这些条件,才会成为例子。作者: jjl314 时间: 2011-2-24 14:55
Thanks for your explain, I'm agree with you