安规网

标题: UL1973 和 UL2054 区别 [打印本页]

作者: 琥珀流云    时间: 2017-5-18 17:45
标题: UL1973 和 UL2054 区别
各位大神UL1973 和 UL2054 的应用区别在哪啊?
作者: fasten    时间: 2017-5-19 08:35
Scope不能看出来区别?
作者: 琥珀流云    时间: 2017-5-19 10:21
fasten 发表于 2017-5-19 08:35 # e) ^  }8 Q  }! c2 M
Scope不能看出来区别?

) r; h3 B: F3 F( p我们的产品是一个3000W 的BBU 跟PSU 连接在一起,当PSU 通电的时候,PSU 给BBU 充电。当PSU 断电的时候,BBU 给PSU 提供DC,最终输出给系统供电。
( [. d9 g9 L( @! z我们纠结到底是用UL1973 还是UL2054 。我觉得是用UL2054 但是客户说要做UL19738 @5 r3 r' N4 a$ d  B1 ~+ |6 P
UL1973) C9 F; d2 g8 I& p; c( p0 O
1.1 These requirements cover electric energy storage systems as defined by this standard for use as
4 A" T6 Q( c$ X% H" Oenergy storage for stationary applications such as for PV, wind turbine storage or for UPS, etc.
7 T9 Q( ^1 b3 q9 {applications. These systems are to be installed in accordance with the National Electric Code, ANSI/NFPA
  d& n: y2 A( k! \70 or other applicable installation codes.
9 B1 @; D2 A. n' h1.2 These requirements also cover electric energy storage systems (EESS) as defined by this standard
, T" w* R. C! B: {for use in light electric rail (LER) applications and stationary rail applications such as rail substations
; }" R) U+ l' p( N
& t+ |) G0 C5 p" d0 X9 X# _* M% vUL2054: @, T' ]) k( a5 V- G% ]' n
1.1 These requirements cover portable primary (nonrechargeable) and secondary (rechargeable)
( ?7 o. G4 r+ n. v8 x6 E! Gbatteries for use as power sources in products. These batteries consist of either a single electrochemical
! }1 K+ O+ {; P9 u; S+ Dcell or two or more cells connected in series, parallel, or both, that convert chemical energy into electrical
- Y. r' j( R# G" M* W! f0 O3 N2 m# Yenergy by chemical reaction.0 U( r6 [  \3 I" ~+ G

( s& g  y, k/ R* k9 h1 D. k* N6 v
作者: kevin245    时间: 2017-7-11 14:45
我覺得UL 會跟你說要做UL1973, 有答對嗎??
作者: 食蕉蕉啦你    时间: 2018-1-11 21:35
个人觉得应该是做UL1973
作者: a13140088    时间: 2018-1-17 12:20
搞不懂啊?
作者: powerlg    时间: 2018-7-23 11:13
简单点:UL 2054 protable apparatus, UL 1973 stationary apparatus
作者: 有你有晴雨    时间: 2018-8-11 11:47
222222222222222
作者: 冷枫    时间: 2018-8-11 13:59
UL2054 主要是家用和商用的电池包,UL1973 最新版连标准名称都改了,主要是储能
1 Y+ m. `* ]% s$ F& f; I0 ~% U8 {  K% i2 v* t9 q: i6 k6 b( J
像3000W的BBU,机构一般不接受做UL2054的
3 i* L$ y' C8 ~; E" n/ G* e
, S* r- @/ b. L9 b$ t! k. B2 |从认证角度看,如果终端是要做950/62368, 理论上,有下面两条路可选:
: J' J( n' Z4 O1. UL2054 + IEC62133; ' {' |  J7 L0 X& h6 q" D- Z
2. UL1973
# x, _6 S/ N& L7 Z' m" _4 @) }4 U3 ?
6 b- v) u( ^- y0 e" G, \& M# J2 bUL1973的费用贼贵,一般客户都是想方设法选用方法一,很少有客户选用方法二。UL1973 一旦扯入UL991和UL1998的软件评估,费用周期等等还得再翻翻。。。。。。。
作者: Berryang    时间: 2021-8-7 12:41
做了62133 ,为啥还要做2054??




欢迎光临 安规网 (http://bbs1.angui.org/) Powered by Discuz! X3.2