安规网

标题: DSH 399 Component impedance [打印本页]

作者: 小米    时间: 2012-11-5 11:51
标题: DSH 399 Component impedance
DSH 399
  F. y: `6 u8 w& Y7 |

$ J' f! f8 ^# u5 L
Component impedance
: h+ s/ {7 n5 \6 {7 w2 ?$ l
17a) and 17g)$ g3 o& g4 F) l. X. H+ D
60601-1(ed.2);am1;am2
9 _+ A. v, s( E& f: j; P" N2 V

6 `1 I- p3 E" I. o; l8 wStandard(s)- (year and edition):/ X9 L/ u* E% s# i
IEC 60601-1:1988 Ed.2 Am1+Am2
6 F' a* _3 ]: f- Z* x5 l) oSub clause(s): 17 a) and 17 g)
" f& `; K, [9 S9 Y8 ^Sheet n°: DSH-399# p& z9 a2 o) O0 _
Subject: Component impedance
) T7 t0 }- d4 M( @8 NKey words: Component impedance, high integrity, e/ M3 P+ D5 i; q: R4 x
Confirmed by CTL at its 39th meeting, in Cologne2 J/ ?7 q3 R% E9 s
Question:2 |: j& B# ~9 G3 z0 f( W* n2 ^$ v
Component impedance is generally unreliable. Components certified to IEC 60384-14 etc. can2 c+ v3 R$ e. N: V! K' M
be considered of high integrity. Is the impedance of a component sufficient? Does investigation
6 C: S7 F; V, V) m, {+ Nof the product require further review of AIR CLEARANCE and CREEPAGE DISTANCE for such
9 P, [/ b: q8 m  `" m) qa component? Does this sub-clause mean that further component review is not required?
: P9 O; {9 k1 {5 j/ G2 m+ k) ~0 iDecision:
# _( t0 f6 o5 a6 @8 y- G' }Secondary circuits providing protective means after short-circuiting of inadequate AIR
( P% R( j; ^7 l- Q$ Q2 q, ]CLEARANCE and CREEPAGE DISTANCE must be investigated. Failure of components in
$ j9 @; r  k6 |( Z" m8 A; w2 p2 v# dthese circuits shall be investigated as a SINGLE FAULT CONDITION. J$ I8 Q# E' Y: |/ m

. e- X1 n" T# f$ c[attach]77108[/attach]
9 P: y' b7 P$ E) p+ x




欢迎光临 安规网 (http://bbs1.angui.org/) Powered by Discuz! X3.2