Integrity of clearances and creepage distances + s4 z" a$ E( u8 G& k2 i3 O+ T
10.1% m5 |$ n. P1 W# h( Y6 M! x
61010-1(ed.1);am1;am24 |0 e7 `0 j( A+ @
2 \( K# j+ K E! A& R# D X. |
/ Q& I0 I1 t. z( V. o G3 c* u
Standard: 9 a# d' {: y4 g# {. q UIEC 61010-1:1990 +A1:1992 + A2 & ~, ]+ q; l. M:1995% z1 k$ s* c4 I, k! T; J
Sub clause: $ p( E( }; q; a, q5 g) \8 d10.1 / R& G. i x2 xSheet n. 337 3 t: [# a! a, _/ k6 N* ~( F( VPage 1(1) $ x. S/ n7 r+ j, F" tSubject: 7 _- y) M/ ^) P4 x# \Integrity of clearances and' x$ l# g& C1 ]" X. V) Y# k
creepage distances , D" h3 L6 i* c5 @# n+ n* pKey words: " ]- U8 Z* n8 O: B- f- Clearances distances 2 G7 s, d1 R2 k7 @2 P1 r- Creepage distances % e1 |( E2 n1 c! t; e; s& yDecision n. 23 taken at - R$ I- @* b/ h. R37th meeting/2000 2 z/ e4 I5 V- N. D8 z+ J( NQuestion:7 Y6 ?9 {. s; O9 R. o
Strict interpretation does implicate a lot of test work. 0 s( u+ X: p% ~4 YHow is this clause considered for compliance? |% d! g( T7 @+ c# e
This question is from CTL.9 p% i& d% s8 |! H+ B
Decision:8 c5 e+ x2 X% i* ^, O
See Explanatory Notes8 y n1 h# E) L
Explanatory Notes: a, B/ R# I1 p3 G7 ~
The compliance requirements suggest that, in case of doubt additional tests are required to. |; [( r; v. a0 F l8 B P0 `
ensure the integrity. Where examination of the data and the test results cause concern then1 ^- V* O% b/ c& Q2 P
further tests are needed at 40°C ambient followed by measurements of the concerned area for/ h" R2 P9 ?2 i0 A
the creepage and clearance distances.: C# G5 r3 I& w4 X; H/ D8 `
+ i% S1 i' R) l. [9 P) j[attach]76210[/attach] , u2 e' J. L" e. w% p1 x& K# `8 m% H % ~1 s( e7 K' e7 M+ l$ S9 y