; e6 T3 c# i9 Y1 I' r9 m0 kStandard: 9 Q: B# J: l: R X; ^5 R7 DIEC 61010-1:1990 +A1:1992 + A2 * F3 @( b4 [3 w:19957 G* M: g( b5 `- T+ x o
Sub clause: : I# R4 X7 q# N; _4 a( FAnnex F.2.1 " B9 ?7 y- D2 \( k8 iSheet n. 370 3 I4 ~4 N. V; x% n# G" GPage 1(1) , ~8 Z+ p- d. j5 B0 `. I7 fSubject:3 f+ x6 [# k4 ?8 p3 @+ q3 b
Limited Circuits 4 Y. L, ?- e' a, \ O: m5 D# d C% YKey words: 6 G: {5 [8 O1 X8 w& w& a4 eLimit values1 }, [) n& H6 ]$ l5 |% f) g; n
Decision taken by) P0 B% Q$ C8 s/ C M- k4 z4 n5 D9 w/ y
ETF3 and confirmed& p, S4 z4 E u( ~: Q4 k, v1 A
by CTL at its 38th2 s3 L: q- q* H! ]3 G$ x9 g
meeting, in Toronto ( v) k( f8 c% A) G: M/ x" SQuestion:1 u% b3 p+ y" y0 ~0 \5 J
It is stated that circuits exceeding 42.4V dc are not limited circuits. Since we assume, that / E7 F6 h" }& d/ tthis value is not the intended one (because this value correspond with the peak value of! @7 H" W5 O, ?) r6 d( o; }
6.3.1.1) what is the common understanding of the Test Houses for a circuit with 50V dc? 3 N/ p2 [7 y: v; ]+ JDecision:3 y8 O( [' `6 m/ }- o/ F, z
The values given in Annex F.2.1 should be in line with the values in sub-clause 6.3.1.1. It 2 d! w3 Y( K+ w6 q4 N- p7 kwas pointed out that values in Annex F.2.1 are typographical errors and should be corrected." _; a9 o& M+ i5 j O0 R
8 T, B: x8 n+ w T
[attach]76162[/attach]9 ~2 i- m5 }0 ^% D/ v, T
3 ?8 p( c: r( s# {/ X, H