barry 发表于 2007-6-9 11:52

引用第9楼LEAD-SWB于2007-06-08 16:56发表的:
请问fasten有何疑问

他的意思是说，如果大家看了他的贴子仍有疑问，他等会再来详谈。。。

你理解错了，不是fasten有疑问。

fasten 发表于 2007-6-9 12:13

引用第10楼barry于2007-06-09 11:52发表的:


他的意思是说，如果大家看了他的贴子仍有疑问，他等会再来详谈。。。

你理解错了，不是fasten有疑问。

确实是有疑问：



Battery packs for tools covered under this annex intended to be charged by a non-isolated
charger shall be evaluated by this annex and standard.

此附录个人认为是把充电器不考虑来说的，如上面这段的潜台词！

LEAD-SWB 发表于 2007-6-9 16:12

对，充电式工具工作时，应不再充电。

LEAD-SWB 发表于 2007-6-9 16:16

When evaluating a battery pack for protection against electric shock, creepage distances, clearances and distances through insulation, the battery pack shall be fitted to the intended charger。如何理解？

jsh863csh 发表于 2007-6-23 11:56

LEAD-SWB 发表于 2007-6-25 16:24

Battery tools covered by this annex are not considered to be class I, class II, or class III tools
and therefore are not required to have basic, supplementary or reinforced insulation. Electric
shock hazard is considered to exist only between parts of opposite polarity.

franco 发表于 2007-6-27 23:35

引用第11楼fasten于2007-06-09 12:13发表的:


此附录个人认为是把充电器不考虑来说的，如上面这段的潜台词！
This annex does not apply to battery chargers which are covered by IEC 60335-2-29.
这句话已经说得很明白了,正如你所说,不考虑充电器.

franco 发表于 2007-6-27 23:39

引用第13楼LEAD-SWB于2007-06-09 16:16发表的:
When evaluating a battery pack for protection against electric shock, creepage distances, clearances and distances through insulation, the battery pack shall be fitted to the intended charger。如何理解？
这句话的意思很明白呀!
就是说,在考核电池包的爬电距离,电器间隙和穿通距离时,必须在电池包插在充电器上时的状态来考虑!

灵猎手 发表于 2007-7-3 13:08

看你的产品电源线插头是三岔还是两岔，三岔就是一类，两岔就二类，绝对没有三类的。

sam-yang 发表于 2007-7-14 15:35

真够乱的　充电式工具不属于一二三中任何一类
页: 1 [2] 3
查看完整版本: 请问手持充电式电链锯应判为几类器具？