sweetlin 发表于 2010-7-8 15:41

EST/EUP/MEPS/ELI

想问下各位大侠,EUP/EST/MEPS/ELI 这四个项目之间的共同点与不同点,

在什么情况下,可以转化啊?

另外做性能测试的话,有没灯头之分呢?

kamleung 发表于 2010-7-9 17:07

1) EuP:
To affix CE-Mark on your lamps, your product must be tested with Regulation (EC) 244/2009. Three basic requirements must fulfil:
          - Efficacy
          - Functional requirements (such as life time ... and etc)
          - Labelling

2) For MEPS:
Different lamps will have different standards. After test, registration is necessary. Below is the list of test standards for lamps:
          - AS/NZS 4782: fluorescent lamps
          - AS/NZS 4847: Self-ballasted lamps for general lighting services (CFLs)
          - AS/NZS 4934: Incandescent lamps for general lighting services

3) ELI
ELI is a non-profit organization to provide energy efficiency certification for light product. It just gets the requirements for CFL and FL only. As it is notmandatory mark, I know so a few about it. You may read my attachment for his CFL requirements.

4) EST
It is a voluntary mark issued by a UK department. EST only gets the requriemtns for the CFL/LED/halogen lamp bulbs. As UK is the EU member sate, the CE-Mark is OK for UK and therfore only the ErP (EuP) is necessary. If you are still interested in EST requriements, you may read my attachment .

Except ErP and MEPS, the other two are not required in law. So far as I know, Australia does not accept CE-Mark in his country. I am not sure whether Australia may consider ErP report for the MEPS registration or not.

littlefish66 发表于 2010-7-9 21:18

thanks kamleung

球标 发表于 2010-7-17 10:39

不错的,原来在这里可以看到这么多的好东东
页: [1]
查看完整版本: EST/EUP/MEPS/ELI