IEC60601-1 分离的电源
请问：标准7.9.2.3 节中说指定连接到分离电源的设备，怎样算作分离的电源？
电池or适配器供电？
本帖最后由 lxxcumt 于 2015-8-7 16:13 编辑
8.2.1 Connection to a separate power source
If ME EQUIPMENT is specified for connection to a separate power source, other than the SUPPLY
MAINS, either the separate power source shall be considered as part of the ME EQUIPMENT and
all relevant requirements of this standard shall apply, or the combination shall be considered
as an ME SYSTEM. See also 7.2.5, 7.9.2.14, 5.5 f) and Clause 16.
来看supply mains 的定义：
3.120
* SUPPLY MAINS
source of electrical energy not forming part of ME EQUIPMENT or ME SYSTEM
NOTE This also includes battery systems and converter systems in ambulances and the like.
电池供电的：
3.45
INTERNAL ELECTRICAL POWER SOURCE
electrical power source for operating equipment that is a part of the equipment and which produces electrical current from some other form of energy EXAMPLE Chemical, mechanical, solar, or nuclear
NOTE An INTERNAL ELECTRICAL POWER SOURCE can be inside the principal part of equipment, attached to the outside, or contained in a separate ENCLOSURE.
电池，适配器一般认为是ME的一部分，所以属于seperate power supply.
总之一句话：认为是ME的一部分，或者和ME组成ME system的(比如一些单独的隔离变压器)都是属于seperate power supply.
lxxcumt 发表于 2015-8-7 16:11 static/image/common/back.gif
8.2.1 Connection to a separate power source
If ME EQUIPMENT is specified for connection to a separa ...
separate power source其实就在考量设备供电中区别于mains supply一种外接型电源。如隔离变压器、adapter等。内置型的电池不算的，只是removedparts。 microos 发表于 2015-8-7 16:36 static/image/common/back.gif
separate power source其实就在考量设备供电中区别于mains supply一种外接型电源。如隔离变压器、adapter ...
有道理，但是这个界定标准中似乎有点模糊。 本帖最后由 microos 于 2015-8-7 16:55 编辑
lxxcumt 发表于 2015-8-7 16:43 static/image/common/back.gif
有道理，但是这个界定标准中似乎有点模糊。
概念是放在标准的结构里理解的，多联系语境。
这个source既可以作为设备一部分，又可以作为ME system，还不是mains。电池肯定不是了。
谢谢各位。
意思是适配器就可以算作分离的电源，而电池就不能算咯
ACCESSORY可以算作设备的组成部分吗？那电池可以算作ACCESSORY？ 小二哥好 发表于 2015-8-7 17:21 static/image/common/back.gif
谢谢各位。
意思是适配器就可以算作分离的电源，而电池就不能算咯
ACCESSORY可以算作设备的组成部分吗？那 ...
好好读定义。accessories 和detached part（removed part）要分开。
页:
[1]
